Chesterfield, MO
Appeals Lawyer at Chesterfield, MO
Practice Areas: Appeals, Business, Estate Planning
OUTCOME: The judgment was reversed primarily because of inherently inconsistent findings, including a reversal on all seven points raised by the mother in her cross-appeal.
This was a suit in a domestic relations case to modify custody, child support, maintenance, to determine amounts due in the property division, and to award fees. This was the second appeal in the same ... modification case.
OUTCOME: The Eighth Circuit vacated the judgment with instructions to remand the case the state court.
This was a federal appeal from a judgment dismissing inverse condemnation and constitutional claims with prejudice.
OUTCOME: The Court reversed the judgment on the modifiability of maintenance, but affirmed on the ultimate decision to deny modification.
This was an appeal by a former husband from a judgment denying his motion to modify or terminate his maintenance obligation. I represented he ex-wife.
OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the relocation and award of attorney's fees for contempt, but reversed on custody, maintenance and child support. The cross-appeal from the contempt judgment was dismissed as premature.
This is an appeal and cross-appeal challenging almost every aspect of a judgment for relocation, modification and contempt.
OUTCOME: The Eastern District reversed the judgment for a full order of protection and remanded with instructions to vacate the order.
This was an appeal from an adult abuse protection order. Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court's finding of "stalking" under the statute
OUTCOME: The Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment granting insurance coverage.
The issue in this appeal was whether an insurance company was responsible for surety defense costs arising from an environmental damage claim.
OUTCOME: The Eastern District reversed the trial court's judgment and terminated maintenance.
This was an appeal from a modification order removing a termination date for maintenance.
OUTCOME: The Missouri Supreme Court ruled in favor of the hospital. The Court affirmed a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission awarding reimbursement to the hospital.
The major issue was whether the Division of Medical Services violated notice and comment rule-making requirements when it changed its method for calculating the "estimated Medicaid days" of hospital pr ... oviders.
OUTCOME: The Eastern District reversed the trial court's judgment denying a private road by necessity and remanded for a new trial on that issue
The plaintiff sought to create a private road by necessity or prescriptive easement.
OUTCOME: The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the judgment on maintenance. The Court created a new test for assessing when an IRA could be considered in a maintenance case.
This was an appeal from a judgment in a divorce action. The issue was whether the trial court erred in refusing to consider wife's income from an IRA in calculating maintenance.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
