Carlsbad, CA
Corporate and incorporation Lawyer at Carlsbad, CA
Practice Areas: Corporate & Incorporation, Business, Intellectual Property
OUTCOME: Writ of Prohibition issued
Because the Ohio Oil and Gas Commission patently and unambiguously lacked jurisdiction over the appeal from the chief's issuance of a permit to drill an oil and gas well, the Supreme Court of Ohio gran ... ted a write to prohibit the Commission from exercising appellate jurisdiction to review the Chief's decision.
OUTCOME: Judgment reversed and remanded
The Supreme Court of Ohio held that the allocation under R.C. 5751.20 of the commercial-activity-tax revenues derived from the gross receipts of the sales of motor-vehicle fuel to nonhighway purposes v ... iolates Article XII, Section 5a of the Ohio Constitution.
OUTCOME: Successfully obtained reversal of trial court decision denying dissolution; and, discretionary review denied by Ohio Supreme Court
Suit for dissolution of a divided/closely-held corporation
OUTCOME: Case voluntarily dismissed by Relator
Complaint in mandamus. Represented Respondent Mahoning County Board of Commissioners.
OUTCOME: Decision affirmed, in favor of Appellee
2010-Ohio-6279 Represented National Governors Association urging affirmance of the lower court opinion. Taxation — Sales tax — R.C. 5739.01(B)(3)(p) — Satellite-broadcasting services — Taxation ... of sales of satellite-broadcasting services but not of cablebroadcasting services does not violate Commerce Clause of United States Constitution — Differential tax treatment of two categories of companies is constitutional when difference results solely from nature of business and not from location of companies’ activities.
OUTCOME: Decision reversed, in favor of Defendants-Appellants, at 538 F. 3d 379 (2008)
Sixth Circuit Case No. 07-3178. Represented Defendants-Appellants Nancy J. Dragani, Acting Director, Ohio Department of Safety, et al.
OUTCOME: Decision reversed in part and affirmed in part, at 2007-Ohio-6833
2006-1855 Certified Conflict Case. Represented Amicus on behalf of Appellant.
OUTCOME: Cause dismissed upon Motion to Dismiss by Respondent Marc Dann
2007-1894 Original Action in Mandamus and Prohibition. Represented Respondent Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann.
OUTCOME: Decision in favor of Appellant, reversing and remanding
2007-1011 Discretionary Appeal. Represented Appellant Ohio Department of Commerce Division of Financial Institutions.
OUTCOME: Decision in favor of Appellant, reversing, at 2007-Ohio-3724
2006-0690 Discretionary Appeal (Non-felony); Claimed Appeal of Right. Represented Amicus on behalf of Appellant.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
