In State, Exrel. Gassman vs. Adminisator( 1946), 146 oHO sT.618, 92 of use)
Jan 01, 1946OUTCOME: Expanded loss of use of body Parts for injured workers
In State of Ohio has decided, albeit some time ago, that ANY injured worker who sustaines an injury to any body part, so long as that arem or leg or eye, bee it to point to the the effected body part ... is deemed useless. There are specid tules for loss of use of the Eye (s) and often when there are two ore more body parts that are different in parts of the whole body; A person could be declared Permanently Totally disabled, by other means.. but this is a good example. State Ex rel. Bohan v. Industrai Decion.(1946),146 Ohio. St. 218 op 67 N.E.2nd 618
