People v. S.A.
Aug 18, 2015OUTCOME: Case was set for trial, and ultimately dismissed.
Client, a CDL holder, was involved in a accident and cited with a moving violation. Any plea, or finding of guilty would have affected client's CDL.
Chicago, IL
DUI and DWI Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: DUI & DWI, Speeding & Traffic Ticket, Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Case was set for trial, and ultimately dismissed.
Client, a CDL holder, was involved in a accident and cited with a moving violation. Any plea, or finding of guilty would have affected client's CDL.
OUTCOME: Charge amended down to a petty offense and client was placed on court supervision.
Client charged with Class A Aggravated Speeding. If convicted, client faced up to 364 days in jail and a fine up to $2,500. Client also had prior speeding charge.
OUTCOME: Charge amended down to a petty offense and client was placed on court supervision.
Client charged with Class B Aggravated Speeding in a construction zone.
OUTCOME: Charge amended down to a petty offenseand client was placed on Court Supervision
Client charged with Class B Aggravated Speeding, faced up to 6 months injail and a fine up to $1,500.
OUTCOME: Charge amended down to a petty offense and client was placed on Court Supervision
Client charged with Class B Aggravated Speeding, and was facing up to 6 months in jail and a fine up to $1,500.
OUTCOME: Charge was amended down to a petty offense and was placed on Court Supervision.
Client charged with Class A Misdemeanor Aggravated Speeding, and was facing up to 364 days in jail and a fine up to $2,500.
OUTCOME: Charge amended down to a petty offenseand client was placed on Court Supervision
Client charged with a Class A Aggravated Speeding, and was facing up to 364 days in jail and a fine up to $2,500.
OUTCOME: Charge amended down to a petty offenseand client placed on Court Supervison
Client charged with a Class B Aggravated Speeding, and was facing up to 6 months jail, and a fine up to $1,500
OUTCOME: Case dissmissed
Client, a CDL holder, was charged with speeding.
OUTCOME: Case dismissed
Client, a CDL holder, was charged with a moving violation.