Chicago, IL
Criminal defense Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI ... +8 more
OUTCOME: CASE DISMISSED AT PRELIMINARY HEARING
THE POLICE STOPPED OUR CLIENT FOR NO REASON AND SEARCHED ALL OF THEIR POCKETS. DURING THE UNLAWFUL SEARCH, ONE OF THE POCKETS ALLEGEDLY CONTAINED HEROIN. AT THE PRELIMINARY HEARING THE CASE WAS DISMI ... SSED
OUTCOME: CASH RETURNED
Illinois State Police “ISP” unlawfully took more than $45,000 in cash from our client. The ISP stopped our client’s rental car for speeding on I-80. During the traffic stop the ISP unlawfully used a ... K-9 to search the rental car. During the search the K-9 discovered the cash in the car. We successfully resolved the matter and the cash was returned to our clients because the ISP did not have a basis to seize the cash..
OUTCOME: Not guilty on all charges
Aggravated battery to a police officer and felony fleeing from police in an automobile. No DNA, no fingerprints, no conviction!
OUTCOME: NOT GUILTY
Client was charged with armed violence and mob action. The Client was facing a large amount of prison time and the prison time was extendable. After picking a fantastic jury, we attacked the prosecut ... ion’s case from the start. Next, the Client took the stand and testified his way out of prison by telling the truth. The defense rested. Two hours later, the jury returned with a verdict of not guilty to armed violence.
OUTCOME: supervision
Client was suffering from a chemical imbalance with the meds they were taking. One day they decided to shoplift. Doctors refer to it as a cry for help. We took the case and resolved the mental healt ... h issue with some fantastic treatment facilities. It turns out that the level of medicine they were taking was not at the correct level and was adjusted with great results. The court took note of the treatment. The client received court supervision. The offense will later be expunged.
OUTCOME: Motion to Supress Granted and Case dismissed
Criminal defense case, client’s charged with Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver (PCS w/intent). Motion to suppress evidence was filed and a hearing was conducted. At the supp ... ression hearing, the client refused a police officer’s request to search the client. After the client refused the police officers request to search the client, the police officer searched the client. The court held the client’s right to be protected against an illegal search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment were violated by the police officer. The court granted the motion and suppressed the evidence. Case dismissed.
OUTCOME: Case dismissed
Client cited for speeding after unmarked police car followed Client within inches. Client accelerated to change lanes and was cited for speeding at that time.