We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Joan Arthetta Hill-McClain
Claim Profile
Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.
About Joan
Practice Areas
This attorney has not specified their practice areas.
Fees and Rates
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in Illinois for 37 years
State: Illinois
Acquired: 1988
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2021
Location
Hillmcclain Law
1016 W Jackson Blvd Ste 80, Chicago, IL, 60607-2914
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
Joan Arthetta Hill-McClain's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
4 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (4)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Communication Style
Posted by anonymous | July 31, 2015 | Criminal Defense
Not very professional
I would not recommend this attorney for any criminal matter. She rarely returned our calls and seemed unprepared at most of our court appearances. She was easily agitated and argumentative and it was hard to connect with her as my representative. I was very disappointed in how she conducted herself...
Joan Arthetta Hill-McClain's Lawyer Endorsements
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
Experience
Professional misconduct
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2021.
Suspension Until Compliance With Condition(S) issued in IL, 2021
updated on 04/07/2021A suspension until compliance with conditions reflects a determination that the lawyer has engaged in misconduct and that the misconduct warrants an interruption of the lawyer's authority to practice law during the suspension period, which is a fixed period of time identified in the Supreme Court's order and until the lawyer complies with condition(s) imposed by the Court. The lawyer is not authorized to practice law during the period of the suspension.