Can they? Sure. Will there be a business advantage for them to do so? Not nearly as sure. If you were to retain a trademark lawyer to advise you...

The answer is in the Prosecution History. It's publicly available from the patent office and you can read the contents and see what prior was...

Read farther in 17 USC 120(a). "Effective Date. Section applicable to any architectural work created on or after Dec. 1, 1990, and any...

Good answers above. I would also check whether the original work was shown to the public without copyright notice. It is early enough that it was...

First, it will certainly be a violation of the celebrity's right of publicity, so don't do it. You specifically ask about copyright and that might...

Non-competes are PO pretty strictly construed even in states where they are not illegal. I'm theory you might be able 5o have enough documentation...

Registration means they have a legal presumption of the exclusive right to use the registered mark on the registered goods. Any use of a similar...

If those are the only facts, probably. If there are more or different facts, there might be issues. Consider: if your purchase carries with it a...

If it's recognizable it's a trademark problem. If it's art it might be both trademark and copyright. Both have fair use defenses that depend...

If you clicked and got a warning, you shouldn't get in trouble. If you evade security and stream you can get into trouble. It's not only...