John Joseph Muldoon III

He was supposed to be my advocate and instead worked with opposing counsel to achieve the other litigant's aims. He neglected to tell the court about the laws broken by opposing counsel or ask for my attorney's fees back on account of said broken laws. He claimed that there was no action to be taken ...for opposing counsel publishing my social security number in court documents, unless my social security number was used as a result of the publication. He bullied me and talked down to me instead of listening to my side of the story. He did not ask for my attorney's fees back even though i was forced to spend them as a result of illegal eviction obtained against me with no proof of service. Had I been properly served I most likely would not have had to incur attorney's fees as court rules state i would have been allowed to appear for myself. He did not ask for my filing fees to stay the illegal eviction back. But hey, as long as he got paid and became buddies with the criminal opposing counsel, he did his job, right?