Terry J. Smith

PRO

Terry J. Smith

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 41 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Litigation

33 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3600, Chicago, IL

About Terry

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Employment and Labor 50%

Employment Counseling, Preparation of Affirmative Action Plans, Executive Compensation, Administrative Agency Proceedings, NLRB and Labor Management Relations

50%
Litigation 50%

Employment Litigation, Trade Secret/Unfair Competition Litigation, Employment-Related Torts, Breach of Employment Contract Litigation

50%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 38 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1987

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Licensed in Wisconsin for 41 years

State: Wisconsin

Acquired: 1984

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Texas for 29 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1996

Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 40 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1985

Resigned

No misconduct found

Location

Smith O'Callaghan & White

33 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3600, Chicago, IL, 60602

socw.com

Online Presence

Other places you can find Terry online.

Terry J. Smith's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

5 star 0
4 star 0
3 star 0
2 star 0
1 star 0

Terry J. Smith's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Terry

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Illinois Super Lawyer, Chicago Magazine

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Leading Lawyer, Law Bulletin Publishing Company

2018

Illinois Super Lawyer, Chicago Magazine

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Illinois Super Lawyer, Chicago Magazine

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Illinois Super Lawyer, Chicago Magazine

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Illinois Super Lawyer, Chicago Magazine

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America

2009

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2000

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1996 - Present

Partner, Smith O'Callaghan & White

1987 - 1995

Partner and Associate, Schiff Hardin & Waite

1984 - 1987

Associate, Foley & Lardner, LLP

Associations

Chicago Bar Association, Labor and Employment Law Committee

Member

Chicago Bar Association, Federal Civil Practice Committee

Member

Seventh Circuit Bar Association

Member

American Bar Association, Labor and Employment Law Section

Member

National Institute for Trial Advocacy

Sample of Legal Cases

Ottley v. Anixter Inc., United States District Court, Kansas, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147763

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Granted

Brill v. McDonald's Corporation, 28 F.3d 633 (7th Cir.)

7th Circuit affirmed dismissal

Johnson v. Indopco, Inc., 887 F. Supp. 1092 (N.D. Ill.)

Action in its entirety found barred by discovery of misappropriated documents and summary judgment entered in favor of employer on all claims.

Wohl v. Spectrum Mfg., Inc., 94 F.3d 353 (7th Cir.)

Kelley v. Crosfield Catalysts, 135 F.3d 1202 (7th Cir.) and 962 F. Supp. 1047 (N.D. Ill.)

Adamczyk v. Lever Bros. Co., 991 F.Supp. 931 (N.D. Ill.), 33 F.Supp. 2d 679 (N.D. Ill.), 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3494 (N.D. Ill.)

Summary judgment entered in favor of employer.

Dikcis v. Indopco, Inc., 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5276 (N.D. Ill.) and 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234 (N.D. Ill.)

Summary judgment entered in favor of employer.

Stevenson v. Unichema North America, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10547 (N.D. Ill.)

Lawsuit dismissed

Messing v. InPhynet Medical Mgmt., et al., 872 F. Supp. 539 (N.D. Ill.)

Johnson v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. (NIPSCO), 844 F. Supp. 466 (N.D. Ind.)

Johnson v. Indopco, 834 F.Supp. 1039, 846 F.Supp. 670 (N.D. Ill.), Affirmed, 79 F.3d 1150, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6313 (7th Cir.)

Motion to dismiss granted in part, and motion to sever granted in multi-plaintiff case.

Rose, et al. v. Consolidated Elec. Distributors, Inc., 816 F. Supp. 489 (N.D. Ill.)

Employees' motion for preliminary injunction denied.

Layne v. Builders Plumbing Supply Company, Inc., 210 Ill. App. 3d 966, 569 N.E. 2d 1104 (Ill. App. 2d Dist.)

Illinois Appellate Court affirmed dismissal of lawsuit.

Patton v. The University of Chicago Hospitals, 706 F. Supp. 627 (N.D. Ill.)

Motion to dismiss granted in part for employer, dismissing plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress and striking plaintiff's request for punitive damages.

Rolark v. The University of Chicago Hospitals, 688 F. Supp. 401 (N.D. Ill.) and 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14429

Summary judgment entered in favor of employer.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1984

Cornell Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1981

Lawrence University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2018

Webinar and CLE

Key Issues in Trade Secrets Law for Corporate Counsel

2013

Chicago Daily Law Bulletin Annual Employment Law Conference - 2013

The Law of Retaliatory Discharge

Publications

2010

Super Lawyers Magazine Corporate Counsel Edition

2009

Super Lawyers Magazine Corporate Counsel Edition

2008

Corporate Counsel Magazine Who Represents America's Biggest Companies

N/A

Illinois Legal Times Employment Law Roundtable
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution