Fogle v. William Chevrolet, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, 275 F.3d 613 (7th Cir. 2001).
Dec 26, 2001OUTCOME: Fees and costs awarded.
Fraud case with petition for attorney's fees as prevaling party after settlement.
Andy Robert Norman's Legal Cases (20)
Chicago, IL
Lawsuits and disputes Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Lawsuits & Disputes, Consumer Protection, Contracts & Agreements
Harris v. River View Ford, United States District Court, 2001 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 25867 (N.D.Ill. 2001).
Dec 21, 2001OUTCOME: Attorney's fees awarded to plaintiff's attorneys.
Fraud case. Petition for attorney's fees by attorneys for plaintiff after settlement.
Gaddy v. Galarza Motor Sport, United States District Court, 2000 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 13881, (N.D.Ill. 2000).
Sep 20, 2000OUTCOME: Motion to dismiss is denied except as to Count IV.
Fraud/Unfair acts and practices. Motion to dismiss the complaint brought by finance company.
Fogle v. William Chevrolet, United States District Court, 2000 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 11556 (N.D.Ill. 2000).
Aug 08, 2000OUTCOME: Attorney's fees awarded to plaintiffs' attorneys.
Fraud case. Petition for attorney's fees as prevailing party after settlement.
Cruz v. Northwestern Chrysler Plymouth, Supreme Court of Illinois, 179 Ill.2d 271 (1997).
Nov 20, 1997OUTCOME: Supreme Court held that attorney's fees petition for prevailing Plaintiff must be submitted at court-annexed arbitration.
Fraud case. Consumer prevailed at court-annexed arbitration hearing; question was whether petition for attorney's fees should be presented to the arbitration panel or the court.
Kolar v. Arlington Toyota, Illinois Appellate Court, 286 Ill.App.3d 43 (1st Dist. 1996).
Dec 31, 1996OUTCOME: Court held that attorney's fees sought by the prevailing party must be presented at the arbitration or be waived.
Fraud case. Consumer prevailed at court-annexed arbitration hearing; question was whether petition for attorney's fees should be presented to the arbitration panel or the court.
In re Ball, United States Bankruptcy Court, 201 B.R. 2004, (U.S.Bk.N.D.Ill. 1996).
Mar 26, 1996OUTCOME: Bankruptcy trustee did not have authority to impose a settlement of consumer's case on the consumer.
Truth In Lending Act case. Andy Norman testifies as an expert witness on the requirements of the Act, and violations in this case.
In re Looking Glass, Ltd., United States Bankruptcy Court, 113 B.R. 463 (U.S.Bk.N.D.Ill. 1990).
Apr 18, 1990OUTCOME: Debtor's involuntary payments made to IRS could not be applied against debtor's tax obligations.
Trial related to bankruptcy proceeding, to test whether unpaid withholding taxes could be discharged.
Kleidon v. Rizza Chevrolet, Illinois Appellate Court, 173 Ill.App.3d 116 (1st Dist. 1988).
Jul 08, 1988OUTCOME: Violation of Consumer Fraud Act upheld; award of attorney's fees remanded for additional trial court findings.
Fraud case. Dealership held liable for violation of Consumer Fraud Act by promising one interest rate prior to purchase but completing the paperwork to impose a higher rate; and attorney's fees awarded ... to plaintiffs' attorneys.
Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. Barnes, Texas Supreme Court, 741 S.W.2d 349, 352 (1987).
Jan 01, 1987OUTCOME: Citation with approval to Andy Norman's law review article.
Texas Supreme Court rules on the existence and extent of implied warranties, and cites with approval Andy Norman's law review article entitled "Consumer Service Transactions, Implied Warranty and a Man ... date for Realistic Reform, 11 Loyola Univ. of Chicago Law Journal 405-70 (1980)."
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
