Monika M. Blacha

I hired Monika based on her familiarity with my divorce case and parental allocation judgment, as well as my spousal and child support entitlements. Recently, I found myself involved in a legal matter that was both emotionally and financially draining. My ex- husband falsely accused me of harming my ...daughter and filed a claim against me with DCFS for child abuse and filed an emergency motion to modify parental time. Initially, I was advised by one of the associates to agree with appointing a Guardian ad Litem to proceed with investigation, which I did openly because I had nothing to hide and I wanted to uncover the truth about a difficult situation involving my daughter and how things really transpired. During this process, I was following my case very closely and during my research on previous judgements I discovered inconsistencies that were done in my previous judgment that was handled by another former attorney at the time; so I uncovered new evidence that my ex-husband had not complied with court orders as it was expected at the time, he failed to comply with certain financial obligations specifically from the mandated order. I shared all of these information and provided documentation to prove my statements, I confide all to her to bring justice after my daughter case was properly handled and then she was suppose proceed with the other two specific motions to enforce and to vacate previous judgement, I even provided the IL civil code and specific statute and subsection with case law samples to serve her that will allow to move the case aside and ask for relief in a form of back payments, initially she stated that we need to filed right away and afterward she stated I did not have basis for it. I disagree because I clearly show her proof of misapplication of the law based of my allocation judgement and court calculation sheet, I provided newly discovered evidence, and post divorce fraud, etc. I never thought that Monika would be another average attorney that acquired the typical business pattern as others. However, I was disappointed with the way my case was handled. Monika’s responses to my case were very generic, often simply denying allegations and requesting proof, despite having provided statements and evidence that supported my position. For example, my case included the fact that the DCFS investigation found the accusations against me to be unfounded—information that could have strengthened my case and demonstrated my innocence. I believed it was crucial to include this and other vital facts, such as my role as guardian of the children, but Monika was hesitant, claiming it could harm my case. I strongly disagreed, as I believe transparency and honesty are essential in such situations. To my surprise, Monika filed a motion to withdraw from representing me stating “ irreconcilable differences” which is totally not true, my total bill exceeded $8,000—costs accumulated primarily through email communications and the preparation of motions that were never filed. While I acknowledge her legal experience or trajectory, I felt she did not prioritize my best interests or those of my children. As a client, I believe it’s essential to be actively involved and to have control over your own case, providing clear instructions and understanding your rights. This experience has reinforced my belief that the legal system in the U.S. can be complex and must of the time flawed. Some attorneys may prioritize their fees over clients’ best interests, and the children; unfortunately, there can be a lack of accountability within the system. Clients need to be proactive—know your rights, ask questions, and take an active role in your case. Be your own advocate, conduct your own research, and ensure your legal representation aligns with your goals. My advice to anyone facing legal issues is to set clear expectations from the beginning, stay involved, and remember that ultimately, you are the owner of your case.