Baughman vs. State Farm Mut. Auto In.s Co.

Jan 01, 2005

OUTCOME:

Ferrando vs. Auto-Owners Mutual

Jan 01, 2002

OUTCOME:

Beck vs. Alaska Air Group

Jan 01, 2002

OUTCOME:

Holeton vs. Crouse Cartage Co.

Jan 01, 2001

OUTCOME:

Gallagher vs. Cleveland Browns Football Co,

Jan 01, 1996

OUTCOME:

Moskovitz vs. mt. Sinai Med. Ctr.

Jan 01, 1994

OUTCOME:

Jane Doe vs. State Farm

N/A

OUTCOME: $31,000,000

Jane Doe vs. John Doe

N/A

OUTCOME: $1,100,000

Our 35-year-old client was killed in a motor vehicle collision. The wrongdoer's insurance company paid its policy limits and underinsurance claims where made under policies of the family's employers. T ... his Scott/Pontzer claim involved three separate policies, two for $1 million and one for $500,000. Each of the policies contained a No Stacking provision and, in addition, the policies contained the "broaden coverage" endorsement. The case was mediated and the parties agreed that the damages exceeded the coverage available. The defense argued that the maximum amount of coverage available was $1 million pursuant to the No Stacking clauses. Plaintiffs argued that the No Stacking clauses were, essentially, "inter-family" and thus, were invalid pursuant to the Ohio Supreme Court decision in Savoie.