In re Marriage of Schweitzer, 132 Wn.2d 318 (1997)
Jan 01, 1997OUTCOME: Separate property owned by a party may be changed into community property by means of a 3 prong community property agreement.
H & W kept their separate assets separate. The parties entered into a three prong community property agreement. H claimed it was only for a major vacation he was going to take. Both parties intended ... that the CPA would provide for the W in case of the H dying during his vacation. The W testified that the first prong of the CPA was intended to be permanent, i.e., if her husband died on his travels, all their separate property would still be unquestionably converted to community property. H claimed that he did not recall having even read the community property agreement in the first place. The trial court found that the CPA was only for estate planning purposes. The Supreme Court disagreed with the trial court as the record showed that both agreed to the conversion of separate property into community property.
