Cincinnati, OH
Corporate and incorporation Lawyer at Cincinnati, OH
Practice Areas: Corporate & Incorporation, Real Estate ... +3 more
OUTCOME: An arbitration clause in a residential construction contract was found to be enforceable. The Court preserved the rights of Ohioans to enforce arbitration clauses in their contracts
117 Ohio St.3d 352 (2008-Ohio-938)
OUTCOME: An arbitration clause in residential construction contract was found not to be unconscionable and would be enforced by the Court. The Court ordered the lawsuit held in abeyance while the mandatory arbitration clause was enforced.
448 F .3d 343 (6th Cir. Ct. 2006)
OUTCOME: Decision of the local Board of Zoning Appeals was found not to be arbitrary or capricious and decision to deny conditional use permit to mine and extract gravel was upheld.
12th Dist App. OH 2004
OUTCOME: The Board of Zoning Appeals was found to have acted unlawfully when denying the mining company a conditional use permit and the Board of Zoning Appeals was ordered to issue the permit to the gravel mining company.
12th Dist. App. OH 1991
OUTCOME: Certain municipal officials were not entitled to immunity in a Section 1983 action because their conduct went beyond the scope of their employment and violated the constitutional rights of the Plaintiff.
754 F.2d 371 (6th Cir. Ct. 1984)
OUTCOME: The decision protects the enforcement of arbitration contract
The Supreme Court entered a landmark decision regarding the rights of Ohio contractors and businesses to arbitrate disputes pursuant to a contractual arbitration clause.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
