Kent Benedict Gravelle

Kent Benedict Gravelle

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 6.6

Licensed for 28 years

Insurance Lawyer at Edina, MN
Practice Areas: Insurance, Employment & Labor, Personal Injury, Workers Compensation

P.O. Box 24563, Edina, MN

About Kent

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Contingency

33%-33%


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in North Dakota for 22 years

State: North Dakota

Acquired: 2003

Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Licensed in Minnesota for 28 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 1997

Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Location

Gravelle Law Office

P.O. Box 24563, Edina, MN, 55424

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kent Benedict Gravelle's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Kent Benedict Gravelle's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kent

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.6 (Good)

Honors

1995

Dean's Honor Roll, University of Oklahoma Law School

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Owner, Gravelle Law Office

2008 - 2009

Associate Attorney, Cundy & Martin, LLC

2006 - 2008

Associate Attorney, Tomsche, Sonnesyn & Tomsche, P.A.

2003 - 2006

Associate Attorney, Stefanson, Plambeck & Foss

Associations

Minnesota State Bar Association

Member

State Bar Association of North Dakota

Member

Twin Cities Claims Associaition

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Larson v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, 2012 WL 1899714, 2012 US DIST LEXIS 72234 (Minnesota federal court)

Federal judge granted summary judgment in favor of the government

Vicknair v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., 767 N.W.2d 171 (N.D. S.Ct. 2009)

North Dakota S.Ct. reversed, finding there was no alternative forum for the plaintiffs

George Hsu, MD v. North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners, 726 N.W.2d 216 (ND S.Ct. 2007)

The trial court granted a writ of mandamus ordering the Board to reverse the license revocation. The ND Supreme Court reversed the trial court.

Howard Homes v. Keeler Stucco, Inc., 2007 Minn.App. Unpub. Lexis 1144, 2007 WL 4234628 (Minn.App. 2007)

Swanbeck v. Minnesota State University Moorhead, Minnesota Practice summary at 2007 WL 5321905 and Complaint at 2006 WL 5616701

Summary judgment was granted in favor of the university.

Medland v. Extra Innings Saloon, 2007 WL 5861162, 2007 WL 5861158, 2007 WL 5861156, & 2007 WL 5861159 (Minnesota district court)

confidential settlement

Platt v. Blue Fox Inn & Jimmy's Food & Drink, 2007 WL 4562108 (Minnesota district court)

Summary judgment motion was denied.

Jane Doe v. Independent School District #152, 2007 Minn.App. Unpub. Lexis 54, 2007 WL 92904 (Minnesota Court of Appeals)

Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the school district.

Slivicki v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs, 2006 WL 2780113, 2006 US DIST LEXIS 73437

Federal judge Erickson denied government's motion for summary judgment. Case settled favorably for client.

Gese v. Rasmussen, 2002 WL 31187009, 2002 Minn.App.Unpub. Lexis 1136

Court of Appeals remanded to trial court

See More Legal Cases

Education

1996

University of Oklahoma College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1993

University of Oklahoma

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Publications

1998

International Law Students Association (ILSA) Journal of International and Comparative Law Islamic Law in Sudan: A Comparative Analysis

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution