Scott Alexander Moriarity

Scott Alexander Moriarity

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.5

Licensed for 23 years

Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN

100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1200, Minneapolis, MN

About Scott

Biography

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Minnesota for 23 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 2002

Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Location

Baillon Thome Jozwiak & Wanta LLP

100 South Fifth Street, Suite 1200, Minneapolis, MN, 55402

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Scott Alexander Moriarity's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Scott Alexander Moriarity's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Scott

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.5 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2018 - Present

Partner, Baillon Thome Jozwiak & Wanta LLP

2011 - 2018

Associate Attorney, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, PLLP

Associations

Minnesota State Bar Association, Labor and Employment Law Section

Member

Hennepin County Bar Association

Member

Minnesota Association for Justice

Member

Federal Bar Association, Minnesota Chapter

Member

2012 - 2016

Federal Bar Association, Minnesota Chapter

Pro Se Project Volunteer

2011 - 2012

Federal Bar Association, Minnesota Chapter

Legal Education Committee Member

2009 - 2011

Federal Bar Association - IP Legal Browser

Editor

Sample of Legal Cases

Nagel v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 653, No. 18-1053 (D. Minn. Mar. 4, 2019)

Banks Feed, LLC v. Ani-Logics Outdoors, LLC, No. 16-5225 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 4, 2017)

In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litigation, No. 12-2359 (D. Minn. Dec. 16, 2016)

In re National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts, No. 16-775 (D. Minn. May 10, 2016)

In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litigation, No. 12-2359 (D. Minn. Nov. 16, 2015)

In re IKO Roofing Shingle Products Liability Litigation, 757 F.3d 599 (7th Cir. 2014)

Holbrook v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., No. 12-4166 (6th Cir. July 12, 2013)

Allstate Property & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Linea Latina de Accidentes, No. 09-3681 (D. Minn. Aug. 12, 2011)

Carr v. Flowers Foods, Inc., Nos. 15-6391, 16-2581 (E.D. Pa. May 8, 2019)

Noll v. Flowers Foods, Inc., No. 19-8001 (1st Cir. Apr. 3, 2019)

Johnson v. Thomson Reuters, No. 18-70 (D. Minn. Mar. 19, 2019)

Jalin Realty Capital Advisors, LLC v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co., No. 11-165 (D. Minn. May 16, 2018)

See More Legal Cases

Education

2002

William Mitchell College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1995

University of Minnesota

Bachelor of Music

Speaking Engagements

2017

Minneapolis Community & Technical College

Copyright for Artists

2016

Minnesota CLE Webcast

Good Data, Bad Decisions: What Neuroscience Teaches Us about Legal Advocacy

2014

TwinWest Power Partners

Responsible Hiring and Firing

2014

TwinWest Power Partners

A Quick Introduction to Intellectual Property

2013

TwinWest Power Partners

Document Retention Policies 101

2012

38th Annual FBA Federal Practice Seminar

Anna Nicole Smith Returns to the Supreme Court: Stern v. Marshall and Article I Jurisdiction

Publications

2019

Minnesota Trial Making the Best Claim for ERISA Disability Benefits

2017

ERISA Report ERISA Long-Term Disability Benefits: Deemed Exhaustion and Judicial Review Under the New 2017 Regulations

2012

Online Piracy and Copyright Law Prepare to Be Boarded: Are Your Visitors Pirates?

2011

Federal Bar Association IP Browser Judicial Interview: Judge Arthur Gajarsa, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution