Kai Heinrich Richter

Kai Heinrich Richter

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 26 years

Class action Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN
Practice Areas: Class Action, Consumer Protection

80 S Eighth St #4600, Minneapolis, MN

About Kai

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Class Action 50%

Class actions and collective actions are procedures that allow many people to join together to bring legal claims in one case. These procedures are commonly used to combat illegal activities that have caused similar problems for a large number of people. For example, a class action or collective action lawsuit may start with an employer failing to pay overtime to all employees on a particular shift.

15 years

50%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Minnesota for 26 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 1999

Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Location

Nichols Kaster, PLLP

80 S Eighth St #4600, Minneapolis, MN, 55402-2242

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kai Heinrich Richter's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Kai Heinrich Richter's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kai

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Work Experience

2010 - Present

Attorney, Nichols Kaster, PLLP

2008 - 2010

Manager, Complex Litigation Division, Office Of The Minnesota Attorney General

2006 - 2008

Attorney, Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP

2005 - 2006

Attorney, Litigation Division, Office of General Counsel, Federal Election Commission

1999 - 2005

Attorney, Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP

Associations

American Bar Association

Member

Minnesota State Bar Association

Member

Hennepin County Bar Association

Member

National Association of Consumer Advocates

Member

Minnesota State Bar Association, Consumer Litigation Section

Board Member

Consumer Law in Minnesota

Course Chair

Sample of Legal Cases

Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2003 WL 22990114 (Minn. Dist. Ct. Nov. 3, 2003)

Grutter v. Bollinger, 123 S.Ct. 2325 (2003)

State v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. 27-CV-08-07201 (Minn. 4th Dist.)

State v. National Arbitration Forum, Inc., No. 27-CV-09-18550 (Minn. 4th Dist.)

Hofstetter v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, 751 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (N.D. Cal. 2010)

Slack v. Suburban Propane Partners, L.P., No. 10-2548, 2010 WL 5392845 (Dec. 22, 2010)

Skansgaard v. Bank of America, N.A., No. C11-988-RJB, slip op. (W.D. Wash. Oct. 13, 2011)

Singleton v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, No. 11-1823, 2012 WL 245965 (D.Md. Jan. 25, 2012)

See More Legal Cases

Education

1999

University of Minnesota Law School

J.D.

1995

Dartmouth College

B.A.

Speaking Engagements

2012

Minnesota House of Representatives Civil Law Committee

Testified regarding Senate File No. 429 relating to consumer enforcement litigation and other social justice matters

2011

Minnesota CLE

Consumer Law In Minnesota, Course Chair

2010

Minnesota Attorneys General Training & Research Institute

Contemporary Issues in Consumer Law

2009

National Attorneys General Training & Research Institute

Mortgage Foreclosure Training, Panelist

Publications

2000

27 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 687 (Co-author with Laurie Kindel) Spoliation of Evidence: Will the New Millennium See a Further Expansion of Sanctions for the Improper Destruction of Evidence

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution