James J. Long

James J. Long

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.2

Licensed for 41 years

Antitrust and trade law Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN
Practice Areas: Antitrust & Trade Law, Business, Franchising, Litigation

80 S Eighth St #2200, Minneapolis, MN

About James

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Minnesota for 37 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 1988

Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Licensed in Illinois for 41 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1984

Administrative - Not Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of James J. Long

80 S Eighth St #2200, Minneapolis, MN, 55402

Briggs & Morgan, P.A.

2200 Ids Center 80 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55402

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

James J. Long's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

James J. Long's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse James

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.2 (Excellent)

Honors

2014

Franchsie-Antitrust Litigation, The Best Lawyers In America

N/A

Super Lawyer, Minnesota Law & Politics Magazine

Work Experience

1984 - 1987

Associate, Winston & Strawn, LLP

Sample of Legal Cases

U-Bake Rochester, LLC v. Utecht Bakeries, 2014 WL 223439 (D. Minn. 2014)

Summary Judgment inf favor of Defendant

Confold Pacific v. Polaris, Inc., 433 F.3d 952 (7th Cir.)

summary judgment for defense, affirmed by 7th Circuit

Draughon v. Dretke, 427 F.3d 286 (5th Cir. 2005)

Obtained writ of habeas corpus and vacation of capital meurder conviction

Taylor v. Jostens, 216 F.3d 465 (5th Cir. 2000)

Judgment for Defense

Physcicians Weight Loss Centers v. Creighton, 1992 WL 176992

Summary judgment granted on almost all claims

See More Legal Cases

Education

1984

University of Minnesota Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1981

University of Chicago

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2008

Healthcare Convention & Exhibitors Association, Annual Meeting

How do Undisclosed Discounts Affect Your Exhibit Program?

2005

Hamline University School of Law

Franchise Law

Publications

2015

Franchise Law Journal (ABA) Statutory Constraints on Substantial Change to Competitive Circumstances of Dealers Creates Substantial Confusion for Compliance

2014

American Bar Association, The Franchise Lawyer Citing Acts of Plaintiffs' Counsel, Court Rejects Rescission Claim

2013

Inside the Minds: Building a Pro Bono Practice Group Developing a Successful Pro Bono Program: Tips for Law Firms

1983

Minnesota Law Review A Clarification and Reformulation of Prevailing Approaches to Product Separability in Franchise Tie-In Sales
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution