Daniel James Herber

Daniel James Herber

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.1

Licensed for 21 years

Litigation Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN
Practice Areas: Litigation, Administrative Law

90 S Seventh St #2200, Minneapolis, MN

About Daniel

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Litigation 70%

19 years | 50 cases

70%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Pro bono

1 %


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Minnesota for 19 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 2006

Authorized to Practice

No misconduct found

Licensed in Wisconsin for 21 years

State: Wisconsin

Acquired: 2004

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Daniel James Herber

90 S Seventh St #2200, Minneapolis, MN, 55402-3901

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Daniel James Herber's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Daniel James Herber's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Daniel
Ryan Richard Seib headshot
Ryan Seib

Unknown lawyer | Apr 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Dan Herber as a skilled, detailed, focused, motivated, communicative, and inventive attorney. I have been fortunate to observe his passion for solving problems in many situations. I recommend his expertise without reservation."

Esmond Young Kim headshot
Esmond Kim

Litigation lawyer | Apr 10

Relationship: Co-worker

"I worked with Daniel on complex litigation tasks, and I recommend Daniel because of his competence and dedication. From observing Daniel as a litigator, I know that he is committed to his clients and his cases. When I worked with Daniel, I always felt like I was working on a team."

View All Endorsements
Ryan Richard Seib headshot
Ryan Seib

Business lawyer

Esmond Young Kim headshot
Esmond Kim

Chapter 13 bankruptcy lawyer

Eric Jay Triplett headshot
Eric Triplett

Environmental and natural resources lawyer

John Richard Gasele headshot
John Gasele

Administrative law lawyer

Tara Elizabeth Nicola headshot
Tara Nicola

Aviation lawyer

Corey Joel Wright headshot
Corey Wright

Litigation lawyer

Colin Emmet Wrabley headshot
Colin Wrabley

Appeals lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.1 (Excellent)

Honors

2013

North Star Lawyer, Minnesota State Bar Association

2012

North Star Lawyer, Minnesota State Bar Association

Work Experience

2016 - Present

Associate General Counsel, University Of Minnesota

2015 - Present

Counsel, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

2007 - 2014

Associate, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

2006 - 2007

Law Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Cirucit

2004 - 2006

Law Clerk, United States District Court--District of Minnesota

Associations

2013 - Present

Volunteer Lawyers Network

Board Member

2011 - Present

American Bar Association Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section and Aviation and Space Law Committee

Member

2011 - Present

Minnesota State Bar Association Environmental, Natural Resources and Energy Law Section

Member

2011 - Present

Hennepin County Bar Association Environmental Law Section

Member

2011 - Present

Aviation Insurance Association

Member

2010 - Present

City of Minneapolis Pedestrian Advisory Committee

Member

2009 - Present

In the Heart of the Beast Puppet and Mask Theatre

Board Member

2013 - 2014

Fund for Legal Aid

Board Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Dilena et al. v. Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. and Cirrus Design Corp.

Dismissed following settlement

Glorvigen & Gartland v. Cirrus Design Corp, et al.

Pending before Minnesota Supreme Court

McCormick et al. v. Piper Aircraft Inc., Avidyne Corp., Des Moines Flying Service, Inc., Modern Aero, Inc., and S-Tec Corp.

Settled

MCEA v. MPUC, MEQB, and Enbridge Energy, Ltd. P'ship, et al.

Complete dismissal in favor of client

Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al.

pending

Streambend Props. v. Ivy Tower Minneapolis

pending

Presbytery of the Twin Cities Area v. Eden Prairie Presbyterian Church

pending

Parker v. New Hampshire Ins.

pending

Dept Public Safety v TracFone Wireless, Inc.

Settled

See More Legal Cases

Education

2004

University of Minnesota

J.D.

2004

University of Minnesota

M.U.R.P.

1993

University of Wisconsin-La Crosse

B.A.

Speaking Engagements

2014

Continuing Legal Education

Your First Civil Case in State Court

2013

Continuing Legal Education

Effective and Efficient Written Discovery

2013

Continuing Legal Education

Your First Civil Case in State Court

2012

Continuing Legal Education

Your First Civil Case in State Court

2011

Second Annual Carbon Management Symposium Climate Change Law

Publications

2014

West Defending Pesticides in Litigation

2013

West Defending Pesticides in Litigation

2012

West Defending Pesticides in Litigation

2010

Ag Professional Magazine Are You Insured?

2009

2007

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution