Christopher Daniel Jozwiak's Legal Cases (17)

Employment and labor

Hibbard v. Park Supply Inc. et al., No. A07-0721, 2008 WL 1748233 (Minn. Ct. App. Apr. 15, 2008)

N/A

OUTCOME:

Reversing unemployment law judge's decision disqualifying plaintiff from receiving unemployment benefits and remanding for further findings on the credibility of plaintiff's testimony.

Employment and labor

Egtvedt et al. v. West Publ’g Corp., 19HA-CV-09-1660 (Dist. Ct. Minn. 2009)

N/A

OUTCOME:

Settlement agreement reached awarding class and collective group of research staff attorneys overtime premium pay pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Minnesota Fair Labor Standards Act, wh ... ere defendant employer misclassified plaintiffs as independent contractors instead of employees.

Employment and labor

Taylor et al. v. Corporate Transit of Am., 09-cv-05709 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

N/A

OUTCOME:

Settlement agreement reached awarding class and collective group of transportation and delivery personnel overtime premium pay pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, and damages for wage deductions ... pursuant to Illinois state and common law, where defendant employer misclassified plaintiffs as independent contractors instead of employees.

Employment and labor

Johnston v. U.S. Bank National Association, No. 08-0296, 2009 WL 2900352 (D. Minn. 2009)

N/A

OUTCOME:

Defendant's summary judgment motion denied where genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether employer's statement that the employee needed a more flexible job to take care of her newborn was e ... vidence of sex-plus discrimination in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act.

Employment and labor

Chavez et al. v. West Side Cmty. Health Servs., Inc., 14-cv-00207 (D. Minn. 2014)

N/A

OUTCOME:

Settlement agreement reached awarding class and collective group of medical assistants overtime premium pay and damages for wage deductions, which they were owed pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Ac ... t and the Minnesota Payment of Wages Act, respectively.

Discrimination

United States v. Law School Admission Council, Compl. U.S. Dep’t of Justice Compl. No. 202-39-97 (Sept. 27, 2011)

N/A

OUTCOME:

Settlement agreement reached allowing complainant all LSAT testing accommodations originally requested pursuant to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination agai ... nst individuals with disabilities by private testing entities that administer examinations related to professional licensing.

Employment and labor

Hayes v. Dapper, No. A07-1878, 2008 WL 4301018, (Minn. Ct. App. 2008)

N/A

OUTCOME:

Dismissal of whistleblower case reversed because a report need not be formal to constitute protected conduct and questions of fact remained whether the report was made in good faith.

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

The Avvo Rating explained