San Francisco, CA
Criminal defense Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI, Speeding & Traffic Ticket
OUTCOME: Dismissed
In the San Mateo County case of People vs. Medina, the defendant had a blood alcohol level of .20 and crashed his car, killing one of his passengers. After a thorough defense investigation and case pre ... paration, the district attorney conceded Mr. Uthman’s speedy trial motion.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
In the Alameda County case of People vs. Peaga, the defendant was charged with deliberately colliding his motorcycle with a highway patrol officer who was standing in the middle of a lane of traffic on ... the bay bridge. Part of Mr. Uthman’s defense was the retention of a retired highway patrol major accident investigator who impeached the credibility of the CHP investigation.
OUTCOME: Dissmissed
In People vs. SEO the defendant allegedly crashed his car on a freeway off ramp in San Francisco and has a blood alcohol level of .22. After years of litigation, Mr. Uthman encountered discovery violat ... ions by the district attorney’s office and the prosecutors “cost’ a critical witness, the DA’s office had no choice but to render the case dismissed.
OUTCOME: Dismissed w/out license suspension
In the San Mateo county case of People vs. Liang the defendant was found allegedly alone, behind the wheel of his crashed car on a freeway off ramp, with a blood alcohol level of .21. After a thorough ... defense investigation, Mr. Uthman was able to prove to both the district attorney’s office and the DMV that the defendant was not the driver of his car which resulted in a criminal dismissal and no license suspension.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
In the Sonoma County case of People vs. Reyes, the defendant allegedly left her children unattended in her vehicle in freezing conditions. After a defense investigation it was showing greatly exaggerat ... ed the circumstance and engaged in offensive behavior. The district attorney’s office agreed to grant the defendant diversion and her case was later dismissed.
OUTCOME: Greatly Reduced Charges
In the Alameda county case of People vs. Ruiz, the defendant was stopped by the CHP for allegedly speeding and weaving. The district attorney agreed to reduce the charge to a “Wet Reckless” and the DMV ... “Set Aside” the license suspension on the grounds of “No Lawful Arrest”. The result helped the defendant to avoid a mandatory one year suspension of his commercial driving privilege and allowed him to maintain his employment. The charges in this case were highly reduced.
OUTCOME: Greatly Reduced Charges
In the Alameda county case of People vs. Xie, the defendant was observed allegedly weaving and almost hitting a parked car with a blood alcohol level of .21. After the defense retested the blood sample ... and pointed out inconsistency with the carious tests and other mitigating factors, the district attorney agreed to reduce the charge to a “Wet Reckless”. The DMV later “Set aside” the charge after agreeing with Mr. Uthman’s contention that the officer’s written declaration was deficient. The defendant avoided a one year loss of his commercial license.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
In the Santa Clara County case of People v. Evans the defendant was investigated by insurance company agents who surveilled his home and filmed him mowing his lawn and doing other activities contrary t ... o his disability claim. In his defense Uthman worked with Arthur Butts, a well known San Jose workers compensation defense attorney, using Mr. Butt’s as a consultant and expert witness. Eventually the D.A.’s office conceded flaws in their case.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
