Hawke v. Hawke, No. 50752, 2024 WL 767657 (Idaho Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2024).
Feb 26, 2024OUTCOME: Court of Appeals affirmed District Court - Win
Pamela argues the magistrate court erred in its characterization, valuation, and division of assets that were omitted from the decree and that the district court erred in affirming the magistrate court ... . Those assets include IWC; a horse and two horse trailers; two pieces of real property--the Katie Way property in Kuna and the Bay Oak property in Meridian; and a storage condominium. Pamela also contends the magistrate court erred in its calculation and allocation of the minor children's health insurance premiums and that the district court erred in affirming the magistrate court in this regard. Jason responds that the record and applicable law supports the decisions of both the magistrate court and district court. We hold that the magistrate court's findings with respect to each challenged asset are supported by substantial and competent evidence and that Pamela has failed to show the district court erred in affirming the magistrate court's decision.
