Chad Allen Lanning's Legal Cases (16)

DUI and DWI

State v. M.D., Milwaukee Co.

Aug 02, 2005

OUTCOME: All evidence suppressed, case dismissed.

Client followed by off-duty police officer to his home. As client entered his house, a second, on-duty officer arrived and arrested client as he entered his home. Client later arrested for drunk driv ... ing. We moved to suppress evidence because the officers lacked exigent circumstances to arrest client in his home. Court of Appeals suppressed all evidence finding that the warrantless arrest of client in the curtilage of his home was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

DUI and DWI

City of Oshkosh v. R.S., Outagamie Co.

Mar 28, 2001

OUTCOME: Client found Not Guilty at second trial.

Trial Court refused grant a request for a new trial date to allow defense expert to testify at trial. Client was convicted of drunk driving at the trial without an expert. After an appeal, a new tria ... l was ordered to allow our expert to testify.

DUI and DWI

State v. J.K., Sheboygan Co.

Jul 08, 1999

OUTCOME: Drunk Driving Conviction thrown out, new trial ordered.

Client was convicted of drunk driving after a jury trial. Conviction reversed by Wisconsin Supreme Court, because the trial court improperly refused to strike biased jurors.

DUI and DWI

State v. G.N., Brown County

May 11, 1999

OUTCOME: The Court of Appeals agreed - case dismissed.

State requested a mistrial in the middle of trial to appeal one of the trial court's rulings on the evidence. The State then attempted a second trial. On our request, the trial court then dismissed c ... ase because the State improperly requested the mistrial.

DUI and DWI

State v. M.L., Milwaukee Co

Mar 23, 1999

OUTCOME: Drunk driving conviction thrown out, new trial ordered. Client found Not Guilty at new trial.

Client was convicted of drunk driving after a jury trial. We appealed the trial court's ruling which prevented us from showing the jury that the breath test machine had malfunctioned 153 times. The C ... ourt of Appeal agreed that the jury should have heard this important information and ordered a new trial.

DUI and DWI

State v. D.F., Sheboygan Co.

Dec 09, 1998

OUTCOME: Drunk driving conviction thrown out, case dismissed.

Client stopped for having a "loud muffler." Later, client charged with drunk driving and convicted after a failed motion hearing. Upon appeal, all evidence suppressed because law enforcement could no ... t justify the stop. Client's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures - enforced!

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

The Avvo Rating explained