Mentor, OH
Consumer protection Lawyer at Mentor, OH
Practice Areas: Consumer Protection, Litigation ... +3 more
OUTCOME: Dispositive motion granted for my client [Civil RICO dismissed with prejudice]
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Represented Defendant Shelton and obtained dismissal with prejudice of a Civil Rico claim that was brought against the Defendan ... t. Defendant was sued on Civil Rico and my dispositive motion was granted as to all claims, with prejudice.
OUTCOME: Summary judgment for Plaintiff, $54,000.00
Shelton v. FCS Capital LLC, Case No. 2:18-cv-03723-JDW United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Representation of Plaintiff in Telephone Consumer Protection Act case ... . Summary judgment based on a Defendant who did not respond to Requests for Admission.
OUTCOME: Judgment as a Matter of Law for Plaintiff, $33,000.00
SHELTON v. FAST ADVANCE FUNDING, LLC (2:18-cv-02071) Representation for the Plaintiff in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act case. For various [logistical] reasons I did not timely file for summ ... ary judgment so instead I filed a motion-in-limine to prohibit the Defendant from offering into evidence anything that would rebut the admitted Requests for Admission [Defendant did not respond to Requests for Admission] and to exclude any evidence that was contrary to the Requests for Admission. The court granted the motion and I obtained judgment as a matter of law for the Plaintiff on the first day of what was supposed to have been a multiple day jury trial.
OUTCOME: Default judgment, $205,000.00 for Plaintiff
Lake County Court of Common Pleas [Lake County Ohio] 18CV001031 Representation of Plaintiff in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Driver's Privacy Protection Act case. Default hearing for d ... amages. A 16 call case, which to my knowledge resulted in the highest damages award on a per call/per violation basis, for any TCPA/consumer case, in Ohio. The court accepted my reasoning and analysis of statutory interpretation as to the applicability of multiple statutes allowing multiple damages awards and awarded Plaintiff the following- $42,500 for 17 violations of the Driver's Privacy Protection Act. $24,000 for 16 violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. $16,000 for 80 violations of the Consumer Sales Practices Act. $24,000 for 16 violations of the Telephone Solicitation Sales Act. $24,000 for 16 violations of 47 CFR 64.1200(d) $4,200 for reasonable attorney's fees. $325 for court costs. $70,000 in punitive damages for telephone harassment of Plaintiff. The judgment was then domesticated to the defendant's home state and a lien was placed on his real property.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict for Plaintiff, $105,400
Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Lake County Ohio. 15CV001590 Pro se representation as the Plaintiff in a defamation action for Libel Per se, False Light, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Dist ... ress, and other related torts. I conducted a three day jury trial and obtained a jury verdict in my favor as to Libel/Defamation, False Light, and received compensatory and punitive damages in the amount of $105,400 dollars. I obtained a directed verdict as to 9 of the 10 counter-claims pursued by the Defendant. The Jury found in favor of me as to the Defendant's sole remaining counter-claim. The judgment was domesticated and a lien placed against real property.
OUTCOME: Judgment for Plaintiff $6,000
Municipal court bench trial in Franklin County Municipal Court [Ohio] Representation of Plaintiff in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act case.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
