Phoenix on Peachtree Condominium Association, Inc.

Aug 23, 2012

OUTCOME: The jury returned a defense verdict about an hour after receiving the final evidence and verdict form.

Ty Brown won a defense verdict in a legal malpractice case pending in Fulton County, Georgia. Plaintiff, a condo association, filed suit against Defendants for alleged negligent handling of a complex ... construction liability case. The trial began August 13, 2012 and lasted 9 days. In closing, Plaintiff requested over $3,000,000 in damages.

805 Peachtree Condominium Associates, Inc. et. al. v. Loudermilk/Rohrig, LLC, and Gay Construction Company

Jan 01, 2004

OUTCOME:

C.P. Day v. Hall, Block, Garland and Meyer

Jan 01, 2004

OUTCOME: Defense Verdict.

The Plaintiff developer sued the Defendants, who were the developer's closing attorneys, for 3 million dollars alleging that Defendants' negligent closing of property that Plaintiff was to build a hote ... l on resulted in the hotel being partially built on another person's property. Mr. Brown, representing the Defendants won a defense verdict at a jury trial.

EQR Lincoln Peachtree LLC v. Shepard Crane and Associates, Inc., Lincoln Contractors, 2000 Concrete,LLC, et al.

Jan 01, 2004

OUTCOME:

Thales e-Transactions, Inc. v. MARTA, and Cubic Transportation, Inc.

Jan 01, 2003

OUTCOME: Mr. Brown represented the Defendant Cubic Transportation, Inc. and obtained a defense verdict at a bench trial.

The Plaintiff, Thales e-Transactions, Inc., an international transportation company, brought this $105 million dollar lawsuit against a regional transit authority, MARTA, and a competitor international ... transportation company, Cubic Transportation, Inc.

The State of M.O.D.E., Inc. v. Wilsonart International, Inc. and Meyer Laminates, Inc.

Jan 01, 2001

OUTCOME: The Defendants then settled the case for a fraction of the Plaintiff's claim (70% less than Plaintiff's claim).

The Plaintiff, the bankruptcy trustee of a cabinet installer named M.O.D.E., Inc., brought a $9 million dollar breach of contract, Fair Business Practice Act and Civil RICO case against the Defendant m ... anufacturers, Wilsonart and Meyer Laminates. Mr. Brown, representing Wilsonart and Meyer Laminates, won summary judgment on the Fair Business Practice Act and Civil RICO claims.

Angela Blackmon, et al. v. H.J. Russell & Company

N/A

OUTCOME: Mr. Brown, representing the Defendants, prevailed on a motion to deny class certification, then won summary judgment in favor of Defendants.

This was an attempted multi-million, class action involving 60 putative class members who were residents of an apartment alleging personal injury resulting from mold in their apartments.

FFI Macon, LLC and C. Peyton Day v. Hall Bloch Garland & Meyer, LLP, et al.

N/A

OUTCOME: Mr. Brown, representing the Defendants, won a defense verdict at a jury trial.

The Plaintiff developer sued the Defendants, who were the developer's closing attorneys, for 3 million dollars alleging that Defendants' negligent closing of property that Plaintiff was to build a hote ... l on resulted in the hotel being partially built on another person's property.

Kenny Rogers v. Thomas Threatt, James W. Threatt, Jr. and George E. Butler, II

N/A

OUTCOME: The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant Butler, Rogers appealed that decision, and the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision.

Mr. Brown represented the Defendant Butler in this breach of contract case filed by the Plaintiff seller (Kenny Rogers) who sold the Defendant buyers (Thomas and James Threatt) real and personal proper ... ty at an auction. Butler was the attorney representing the buyers. The buyers agreed to submit 10% earnest money which would be given to the seller if they failed to consummate the contract. The buyers canceled the escrow check arguing that the seller failed to convey personal property included in the auction. The Plaintiff Rogers sued the Defendant Butler for breach of fiduciary duty by failing to convey the escrow money to him.

Optimum Technologies, Inc. v. Vantage Industries, Inc. and Leggett & Platt, Inc.

N/A

OUTCOME: After two weeks of arbitration hearings before a 3-person arbitration panel, obtained a decision from the panel which awarded only 16% of Petitioner’s claim.

The Petitioner, a manufacturer and distributor of rug pad products, brought a $25 million arbitration claim against Respondents for, inter alia, allegedly breaching a distributorship agreement.