Daniel A. Lipsitz

Daniel A. Lipsitz

1.0
Rating: 7.5

Licensed for 23 years

Family Lawyer at Ann Arbor, MI
Practice Areas: Family

315 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 305, Ann Arbor, MI

About Daniel

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Michigan for 4 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 2022

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in New Mexico for 5 years

State: New Mexico

Acquired: 2020

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Idaho for 10 years

State: Idaho

Acquired: 2015

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Missouri for 22 years

State: Missouri

Acquired: 2003

Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in Colorado for 23 years

State: Colorado

Acquired: 2002

Dismissed

No misconduct found

Location

Cordell & Cordell

315 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 305, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Daniel A. Lipsitz's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Professionalism

Posted by Spencer | November 19, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Poor defender, gutless in court, Won't stand up for you

In January 2016, I scheduled an appointment with Dan regarding changing the current child custody order that was in place regarding my son, Bentley, and his mother. We discussed how the current order was not only poorly written but also problematic to both parties and the child. For instance, there w...ere no specific pick up or drop off times stated and it left a lot of confusion and misinterpretation. I was hoping that he could help me clear the confusion and find a more equitable solution for both me and Bentley’s mother. I told Dan I would like to modify the order in the following ways: • 50/50 custody with my son, one week on and one week off. • Forgive all contempt’s that I have against her, and her against me so we can restart this co-parenting and make it a positive environment for our son. • Revise child support my son’s mother’s income went up from 24k-36k The actual results were completely different: • Less frequent child visits • Increased child support • 2 days of jail time • 1 year probation • Publicly humiliated by the judge, who told the court that I have zero credibility, only care about myself and my needs, and that my fiancé and her family are not my son’s family and shouldn’t try to be. • Terrible precedent for future proceedings • Additional attorney fees and more court • If mother files any contempt’s within year of probation I get automatic 15 days in jail, plus whatever the judge decides • The judge’s parting message to me was “You have zero credibility,” and “you are lucky your son’s mother allows you to spend time with him,” and “your son is better off in day care than in your custody.” • Criminal record Dan’s wreckless counsel, carelessness judgements, and gross negligence made in my behalf resulted in 25 contempt charges which landed me in jail for 2 days, a year of probation, $3,000 in fees to opposing council, and a precedence for future hearings. I feel Dan did not advocate for me, nor advise me well. He was ill prepared in his intelligent devotion to excellence and seemed to lack passion for me and my case. All I wanted was a more equitable situation for me and my son. I was not trying to be malicious or mean. I am worse off now than when I hired Dan and the firm of Cordell & Cordell to represent me. A bad situation was made even worse with even more debt and legal expenses to come. I do not feel I received “passionate and intelligent devotion to excellence.” as there website states Mr. Lipsitz was not devoted to my case, my suggestions, or any form of service or excellence. Because of my relationship with Mr. Lipsitz and Cordell & Cordell I am worse off than when I started, in every conceivable way. Would strongly recommend NOT using this firm and would NEVER recommend it to anyone fighting for there fathers rights!

See All Client Reviews

Daniel A. Lipsitz's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Daniel
Javad M. Khazaeli headshot
Javad Khazaeli

Litigation lawyer | Oct 03

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have known Dan for over a decade. He is an extremely skilled litigator and is dedicated to his clients. Highly recommend."

View All Endorsements
Javad M. Khazaeli headshot
Javad Khazaeli

Immigration lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.5 (Very Good)

Education

2002

Washington University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

University of Michigan

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution