MR Technologies, GMBH v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (CDCA No. 8:22-cv-01599)
Jul 19, 2024OUTCOME: $262M Verdict Against Western Digital for Patent Infringement re HDDs
$262M Verdict Against Western Digital for Patent Infringement re HDDs
Minna Y. Chan's Legal Cases (7)
Los Angeles, CA
Patent infringement Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Litigation, Intellectual Property
EcoFactor Inc. v. Google LLC (CAFC No. 33-1101)
Jun 03, 2024OUTCOME: Fed. Circ. Affirmed $20M Trial Win Over Google
Fed. Circ. Affirmed $20M Trial Win Over Google
EcoFactor Inc. v. ecobee Inc. (WDTX No. 6:21-cv-00428)
Jun 26, 2023OUTCOME: $5.4M Verdict Against ecobee for Patent Infringement re Smart Thermostats
$5.4M Verdict Against ecobee for Patent Infringement re Smart Thermostats
Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Co. (CAFC 21-1834)
Jun 23, 2023OUTCOME: Federal Circuit Affirmed $13.6M Judgment Against Kingston
Federal Circuit affirmed our team's $13.6M judgment against Kingston following Kingston's appeal of the jury verdict and the court's willfulness finding.
Google LLC v. EcoFactor Inc. (IPR2020-01504)
Mar 03, 2022OUTCOME: PTAB rejected Google's invalidity challenges to EcoFactor U.S. Patent No. 8,498,753
Following oral argument by Ms. Chan on behalf of EcoFactor, Inc., PTAB rejected Google's invalidity challenges to EcoFactor U.S. Patent No. 8,498,753.
EcoFactor Inc. v. Google LLC (WDTX No. 6:20-cv-00075)
Feb 10, 2022OUTCOME: Won $20M Verdict Against Google (Nest) for Patent Infringement re Smart Thermostats
Won a jury verdict for against Google, Inc. for damages of approximately $20M for Google's infringement of Claim 5 of U.S. Patent No. 8,738,327 with Google's Nest smart thermostats on behalf of client ... EcoFactor, Inc. The verdict validated EcoFactor's patents and held Google accountable for the substantial value to Google of the infringing features.
Pavo Solutions, LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc. (C.D. Cal. Case No. 8:14-cv-01352-JLS-KES)
Mar 12, 2020OUTCOME: ~$7.5 million in damages, plus a finding of willfulness following a jury verdict. Court awarded an additional $3.7M in enhanced damages.
As part of a 5-attorney team, Ms. Chan won a jury verdict for their client, Pavo Solutions, LLC, against Kingston Technology Company, Inc. for damages of approximately $7.5 million for Kingston’s infri ... ngement of U.S. Patent No. 6,926,544. The ’544 patent relates to a USB flash memory drive with a swivel cover design. The jury found that Kingston infringed all asserted claims of the ’544 patent and further, that Kingston’s infringement was willful. The Court awarded an additional $3.7 million in enhanced damages for Kingston’s willful infringement. The trial was held in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, before the Honorable Josephine Staton. The case is Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company Inc., Case No. 8:14-cv-01352. Kingston was represented by Juanita Brooks, David Hoffman, David Morris, Nicole Williams, and Brianna Chamberlin of Fish & Richardson PC. Read the Verdict <https://www.raklaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Pavo-Verdict.pdf>. Read the article <https://www.raklaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Law360-Calif.-Jury-Hits-Kingston-With-7.5M-Verdict-In-USB-IP-Case-Law360.pdf>.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
