Attorney Carl Hugo Anderson Jr.'s Legal Cases

Civil rights

Trinity Outdoors, LLC v. Forsyth County,

N/A

OUTCOME: Successfully resolved through mediation.

A First Amendment civil rights claim brought under Section 1983 concerning a local sign ordinance

Consumer protection

In the Matter of Kroger #299,

N/A

OUTCOME: Obtained a dismissal of sanctions imposed on our client, Kroger #299.

Alleged violations of the WIC program.

Oil and gas

East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. 1.26 Acres of Land et al.,

N/A

OUTCOME: The condemnor’s payment to our clients of more than $43,000 in attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses plus the additional fees of more than $15,000 that were incurred in obtaining the fee award.

An eminent domain action under the Federal Natural Gas Act in which the Defense succeeded in obtaining, on behalf of two small landowner-condemnees, an unusual stay of the condemnation action pending d ... isposition of a related proceeding before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regarding the condemnor’s authority to proceed with its proposed pipeline project.

General practice

Ramos v. Coronet Industries, Inc. et al.,

N/A

OUTCOME: Successful in obtaining not only Summary Judgment against the Plaintiffs, but also an unusual award of costs in excess of $23,000.

A product liability action in which the Plaintiffs asserted an environmental toxic tort claim based on an alleged defect in Defendant’s carpeting product

Antitrust and trade law

AAA Venetian Blind Sales, Inc. v. Coronet Industries, Inc.,

N/A

OUTCOME: Prevailed on Summary Judgment for Defense.

A substantial group boycott action brought under Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act and Section 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act

State, local, and municipal law

Walter Eugene King et al. v. Coweta County, Georgia,

N/A

OUTCOME: Successfully obtained Summary Judgment for Defense.

Section 1983 and state law claims.

Business

Spark Technologies, Inc., v. Biltmore Technologies, Inc.,

N/A

OUTCOME: Successfully sought to rescind a merger and blocked injunction that Plaintiff sought.

Represented the Defendants

General practice

Wright v. Stanford,

N/A

OUTCOME: Obtained summary judgment in the case-in-chief and on the counterclaim.

A legal malpractice case, in which the Firm represented the Defendant/Counterclaimant

Construction and development

Daniel A. Metzler v. Catheren Woolard

N/A

OUTCOME:

A suit to prevent neighborhood activists from blocking development that resulted in favorable sale of property to the Georgia Nature Conservancy at client’s asking price and preserving property as a pa ... rk.