We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Michigan
Acquired: 1997
No misconduct found
State: Indiana
Acquired: 1990
No misconduct found
State: Pennsylvania
Acquired: 1978
No misconduct found
6100 N Keystone Ave Ste 657, Indianapolis, IN, 46220-2430
2 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge
Posted by anonymous | February 08, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Environmental and Natural Resources
Excellent Advocacy- Highly Recommended
Mr. Dearing is a well-seasoned veteran who often thinks outside-the-box to reach favorable results for the lowest costs possible. I have used his services on a variety of environmental and regulatory matters and have never been disappointed. He always discusses strategies well in advance of executing...
Posted by anonymous | April 10, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Land Use & Zoning
Not Impressed - STUNNED by the Bill
What follows is my opinion, nothing more. My wife and I hired David Dearing to help us with a zoning issue with the City of Indianapolis. We use many attorneys, including for our business, and for family law (Wills, etc.), so are extremely familiar with hiring, and working with a lawyer. We have neve...
As many of you know, there is a difference between a fixed fee and an estimated fee. When an attorney offers to perform a task for a fixed fee, he cannot charge the client more than that amount. Typically, an attorney charges a fixed fee when he is fairly certain of the time required for a given task and can factor that time into his charge, for example, when he is asked to prepare a deed or a will. When a task involves a contested matter, as this case did, attorneys generally are reluctant to agree to a fixed fee, because it is difficult to predict how much time will be required. Many factors beyond the attorney’s control may occur that require him to respond and spend additional time. In fact, a client’s behavior during a litigated matter can compound the cost of the litigation and can also impact the client’s chances of a successful outcome. If a client asks, I provide an estimated fee, but always with the explanation that the actual fee may be lower or higher. It is unfortunate but true that there are times when a lawyer-client relationship does not result in mutual satisfaction. In this instance, the client and I negotiated and reached agreement on a compromise payment amount. As a result, I was quite surprised that he would then turn around and post a negative review. Contrary to this posting, the client did not discharge me; rather, I withdrew from the case before the issue of fees arose. I categorically deny the other asserted facts, but because of the confidential nature of the attorney-client relationship, I cannot share private information in a public forum. If a prospective client is reading this and has any doubts about engaging my services, I will freely address any concerns that you may have. I pride myself on offering skilled legal services with the highest integrity.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
1993 - Present
Owner, David E. Dearing Attorney at Law
1989 - Present
Instructor, Wetland Training Institute, inc.
Member
Member
1978
JD - Juris Doctor
1972
BA - Bachelor of Arts
1996
1992
1990
English