Olympia, WA
Criminal defense Lawyer at Olympia, WA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Dismissed
I argued that the officer failed to conduct a proper mouth check and observation period prior to obtaining a BAC sample from my client in violation of 46.61.506(4). The Department of Licensing agreed a ... nd dismissed the suspension.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
I subpoenaed the arresting officer to testify at the hearing. The officer failed to appear. I argued that my client's right to confront the evidence and witnesses against her was violated and that the ... action should be dismissed. The Department of Licensing agreed and the suspension was dismissed.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
My client was charged with criminal trespass. I argued with the Prosecutor that my client was lawfully on the property. Charges were dismissed.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Speeding 61 in a 40 zone. I argued that the speed measuring device was not accurate because there was no 90-day certification of the patrol car's speedometer. The Court agreed and dismissed.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Client was charged with one count of property damage, a gross misdemeanor. I worked with my client and the victim to enter a compromise of misdemeanor and the case against my client was dismissed.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
I subpoenaed the arresting officer to testify at the hearing. The officer failed to appear. I argued that my client's right to confront the evidence and witnesses against him was violated and that the ... action should be dismissed. The Department of Licensing agreed and the action was dismissed.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
I argued the basis for the stop and subsequent arrest of my client was unlawful. The Department of Licensing agreed and dismissed the action against my client.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Speeding 53 in a 35 zone. I argued that there was no connection between the certificate of calibration and the design and construction certification. The Court suppressed the speed reading and dismisse ... d the infraction because there was no other evidence of speed.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
I argued that a foreign substance was not removed from my client's mouth prior to submitting to the breath test in violation of RCW 46.61.506(4)(a)(iii) and therefore the BAC results were inadmissible ... and the action should be dismissed. The Department of Licensing agreed and dismissed the action.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
