Skip to main content
George Peter Mccarthy

George Mccarthy’s Legal Cases

16 total


  • State v. Howard

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Mar 27, 1996
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    Litigation of reasonable suspicion in administrative license suspension hearing does not bar 4511.19 prosecution based upon collateral estoppel argument.
  • State v. Glasure 1996 WL 490125

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Aug 26, 1996
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    Double jeopardy did not bar the state from proceeding after administration license suspension hearing.
  • State v. Skinner 1996 WL 292045

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    May 24, 1996
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN ALLOWING THE STATE TO GO FORWARD AND PRESENT EVIDENCE AT THE MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE HEARING IN THAT THE PRIOR JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT WAS RES JUDICATA AND THE STATE SHOULD HAVE BEEN COLLATERALLY ESTOPPED FROM RELITIGATING THE FACTUAL ISSUE OF THE REASONABLE GROUNDS TO STOP AND DETAIN APPELLANT
  • State v. Orihel 2002 WL 126227

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR IN OVERRULING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE GIVEN THE FACT THAT ALL EVIDENCE WAS OBTAINED AS A RESULT OF AN EXTRA–TERRITORIAL ARREST AND GOVERNED BY THE HOT–PURSUIT EXCEPTION
  • State v. Azcona 1998 WL 102993

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Mar 06, 1998
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    THE DEFENDANT WAS DEPRIVED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BECAUSE OF THE INAUDIBLE TAPE RECORDINGS OF ESSENTIAL WITNESSES DURING HEARINGS
  • State v. Hawes 1996 WL 139777

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Mar 26, 1996
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT THE TESTING OFFICER OBSERVED THE DEFENDANT FOR TWENTY UNINTERRUPTED MINUTES BEFORE ADMINISTERING THE BREATH TEST
  • State v. Huntington

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Feb 18, 1997
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    Statements were in response to custodial interrogation without the benefit of Miranda warnings
  • State v. Strassman

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Nov 20, 1998
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT THERE WAS PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE DEFENDANT'S ARREST
  • State v. Morehouse

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Jan 14, 1993
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION AND COMMITTED PREJUDICIAL ERROR BY SENTENCING APPELLANT, AFTER HEARING A VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT, TO A LONGER SENTENCE THAN APPELLANT HAD BEEN PROMISED
  • State v. Williams

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Mar 20, 1995
    Outcome:
    Affirmed
    Description:
    THE TRIAL JUDGE ERRED IN FINDING WILLIAMS HAD A PRIOR CONVICTION AS NO CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ENTRY WAS INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE