Tarrytown, NY
Land use and zoning Lawyer at Tarrytown, NY
Practice Areas: Land Use & Zoning, Litigation ... +3 more
OUTCOME: Second Department, Appellate Division upheld the Supreme Court's Order in favor of the Town
Appellant appealed Supreme Court's Order upholding validity of restrictive covenant limiting the use of property to commercial recreation that was part of a 75-lot subdivision.
OUTCOME: The Court upheld the Zoning Board's determination that the use was not permitted.
Petitioner brought an Article 78 proceeding challenging the Zoning Board's denial of an interpretation that their proposed "research laboratory" was not permitted under the Village Zoning Code.
OUTCOME: The Court upheld the granting of the area variances
Petitioner brought an Article 78 proceeding challenging the Zoning Board's granting of area variances to construct a pool and related improvements in the rear yard of our clients
OUTCOME: The Court upheld the Zoning Board's denial of area variances.
Petitioner brought an Article 78 proceeding challenging the Zoning Board's denial of area variances
OUTCOME: The Court upheld the Planning Board's approvals
Petitioner brought an Article 78 proceeding challenging the Planning Board's grant of subdivision approval and a wetlands permit
OUTCOME: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Town and upheld the restrictive covenant.
Plaintiff commenced action seeking to extinguish restrictive covenant that was a condition of a subdivision approval
OUTCOME: Petition dismissed, determination of Zoning Board upheld
Article 78 proceeding challenging granting of area variance by Tarrytown Zoning Board.
OUTCOME: Settlement whereby plaintiff was paid in full
We represented plaintiff in suing defendant for two years of waste water treatment services totaling over $150,000.
OUTCOME: The Court overturned the Zoning Board's denial directing the area variances be granted
Represented petitioner in bringing an Article 78 proceeding challenging the Zoning Board's denial of requested area variances
OUTCOME: Village's determination confirmed, petition denied and proceeding dismissed on merits
Eminent Domain Procedure Law 207 proceeding challenging Village's determination that it was necessary to acquire a portion of Petitioner's commercial property by eminent domain.