AFTEC Forming Technologies, LLC v. Permacast, LLC, 342 P.3d 808 (Utah Ct. App. 2015)
Jan 08, 2015OUTCOME: Ruling reversed. Permacast's motion did not assert it was entitled to judgment, only that AFTEC had not proved its damages. But AFTEC was not required to produce such evidence before discovery was complete.
AFTEC licensed its concrete wall forming system to Permacast for use in Florida. The agreement required Permacast to actively market the system brand by putting a link to AFTEC's website on Permacast' ... s website, using the system logo on all promotional materials, and marking the system name on all equipment and finished concrete walls. AFTEC sued Permacast for breaching the agreement. During the course of the case, the parties agreed to an open-ended discovery period which was never modified. Permacast filed a motion for summary judgment contending that AFTEC had not provided proof of its damages. AFTEC opposed the motion as premature, because the discovery phase was still open and the deadline for designating an expert had not yet passed, and because AFTEC's principal had submitted evidence that AFTEC was damaged in a specific amount. The trial court granted the motion, ruling that AFTEC's statement of damages was insufficiently detailed. AFTEC appealed.
