Seattle, WA
Car accident Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Car Accidents, Personal Injury
OUTCOME: DUI amended to Negligent Driving 1st Degree
Client was charged with DUI with a BAC over .15. This was client's second DUI and client also caused an accident on the date of incident. With aggressive negotiation, prosecutor agreed to amend clien ... t's DUI down to a Negligent Driving First Degree.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Juvenile defendant was charged with Robbery Second Degree. With thorough investigation and aggressive negotiation, convinced the prosecutor they had a weak case. Prosecutor dismissed case.
OUTCOME: Settlement
Client was in a rear-end, low impact car crash and treated for 1 1/2 years for soft tissue injuries. After client completed treatment for injuries, we submitted a settlement demand and settled the cas ... e without having to file a law suit. Client walked away with over $15,000 in her pocket.
OUTCOME: DUI reduced to Negligent Driving 1st Degree
Client charged with DUI. Negotiated with prosecutor for a Negligent Driving First Degree.
OUTCOME: Dismissed with Prejudice
Client charged with Violation of Ignition Interlock Device. I briefed and argued a motion to dismiss for speedy trial violations, which the court granted.
OUTCOME: $355,000
Plaintiff was a passenger in an Orange Cab and sustained permanent injuries to his neck, back, and hip when cab driver lost control on an icy road. Orange Cab Company denied liability. Jury awarded v ... erdict of $355,000.
OUTCOME: Verdict $235,000
Plaintiff sued her own insurance company for bad faith and under the Insurance Fair Conduct Act (IFCA) when Allstate failed to make a reasonable offer to settle her UIM claim after a serious motor vehi ... cle collision rendered her with brain injury. Plaintiff was forced to take this case to trial. Jury awarded Plaintiff a total of $15,500 in damages, which the judge trebled. Allstate was ordered to pay $190,000 in attorney fees and costs.
OUTCOME: Plea to non strike offense.
Defendant charged with third strike offense facing life in prison. After arguing motions in limine and right before the commencement of voir dire, prosecutor offers plea deal of 5 years.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Client charged with VUCSA Delivery of Cocaine to undercover officer. During the middle of trial, judge granted a mistrial based on unsolicited prejudicial testimony by detective. Defendant prevailed ... on motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy and CrR 8.3(b) when defendant's right to a fair trial was materially infringed upon by the flagrant misconduct of the detective.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
