Torchik v. Boyce
Mar 25, 2009OUTCOME: Fireman's Rule limited
In a victory for the rights of police officers and firefighters throughout the State of Ohio, on March 25, 2009, an unanimous Ohio Supreme Court refused to extend Ohio’s Fireman’s Rule to allow ind ... ependent contractors to escape liability where an emergency responder (police officer, firefighter, etc.) is injured in the course of their employment as a result of a defective condition created by that contractor. In announcing its decision in the case of Torchik v. Boyce, the Court wrote that it “ruled today that an independent contractor whose negligent work is alleged to have caused injury to a public safety officer is not covered by a common law ‘fireman’s rule’ that immunizes property owners from civil liability for injuries suffered by public safety officers who enter their property while on duty.†The Ohio Association of Professional Fire Fighters, represented by Henry A. Arnett, filed an amicus brief with the Court, urging the Court to refuse to extend the Fireman’s Rule.
