State ex rel. Precision Steel v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, et al.
N/AOUTCOME: Grant of Limited Writ of Mandamus
Administratively, the client was represented by a different law firm and, as a result of the proceedings, the Commission ordered the claimant the maximum 50% award. The Commission found that the employ ... er violated two safety requirements. I assumed representation of the client and filed a Writ of Mandamus to reverse the gross abuses of discretion committed by the Commission in this matter. As a result of my argument, I obtained a Limited Writ of Mandamus ordering the Industrial Commission to vacate the award and its VSSR order.
