Bradley v. Bauldree
Jul 20, 2012OUTCOME: Reversed
101 So. 3d 221 (Ala. Civ. App.2012). Reversing a judgment against my client regarding a real estate contract.
Andalusia, AL
Probate Lawyer at Andalusia, AL
Practice Areas: Probate, Estate Planning ... +4 more
OUTCOME: Reversed
101 So. 3d 221 (Ala. Civ. App.2012). Reversing a judgment against my client regarding a real estate contract.
OUTCOME: Affirmed
33 So. 3d 1249 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009). Appeal after remand of a case involving a sheriff's sale.
OUTCOME: Remanded.
60 So. 3d 948 (Ala. Crim App. 2008). Court of Criminal Appeals agreed that a hearing was necessary in a motion for new trial in a capital murder case and remanded to the circuit court. The judgment wa ... s ultimately affirmed.
OUTCOME: Reversed
4 So. 3d 524 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008). Appeal of a judgment regarding the purchase of property at a sheriff's sale.
OUTCOME: Affirmed
986 So. 2d 374 (Ala. 2007). The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed the judgment in a case involving trust litigation in which I served as special master.
OUTCOME:
988So. 2d 1015 (Ala. 2007) I served as the attorney for amicus curiae, Alabama Probate Judges Association, requesting clarification of procedural matters in the appeal of a real property condemnation ... case.
OUTCOME: Affirmed
972 So. 2d 771 (Ala. 2006). Alabama Supreme Court unanimously adopted my arguments filed for amicus curiae Covington County Bar Association regarding payment of overhead expenses for attorneys appoint ... ed to represent indigent clients.
OUTCOME: Affirmed
868 So. 2d 1191 (Ala. 2003). Certiorari was quashed and the judgment was affirmed, but the dissenting opinion agreed with me that the evidence should have been suppressed.
OUTCOME: Affirmed
868 So. 2d 1189 (Ala. Crim App. 2002), cert quashed, Ex parte Creech, 868 So. 2d 1191 (Ala. 2003). Dissenting opinion agreed with me that evidence should have been suppressed.
OUTCOME: Reversed
822 So. 2d 1180 (Ala. 2001). Reversed the decision of the trial court and agreed with my argument that Alabama had "long-arm" jurisdiction over Georgia defendants because of the course of conduct betw ... een the parties.