Minneapolis, MN
Litigation Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN
Practice Areas: Litigation, Class Action
OUTCOME: Dismissed on Defendant's Motion
Court observes it is aware of no legal authority holding that ineffective service amounts to a deceptive or unconscionable debt collection practice in violation of the FDCPA.
OUTCOME: Class Action Counterclaims and Crossclaims dismissed with Prejudice
"...the court cannot find that Defendant’s class action would meet C.R.C.P. 23(a)(2)’s commonality requirement. As noted, the claims brought by Defendant rarely implicate questions of law or fact commo ... n to the class. Further, to make such a determination requires a fact-specific inquiry, defeating the purpose of a class action. The court agrees with the overwhelming weight of authority indicating that class certification is improper in cases such as this. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Professional Finance Company, Inc. and Banner Health’s Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice Defendant/Cross-Claimant’s Class Action Counterclaim Against PFC and Class Action Cross-Claim Against Banner be GRANTED. The class action claims are hereby dismissed."
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
