Pre-nuptial Agreement
Jan 01, 2018OUTCOME: Enforceable pre-nuptial agreement
Client was seeking pre-nuptial agreement prior to remarrying. After careful negotiation, my client's fiancé agreed in principle to all conditions to marriage.
Woburn, MA
Business Lawyer at Woburn, MA
Practice Areas: Business, Ethics & Professional Responsibility, Privacy
OUTCOME: Enforceable pre-nuptial agreement
Client was seeking pre-nuptial agreement prior to remarrying. After careful negotiation, my client's fiancé agreed in principle to all conditions to marriage.
OUTCOME: Judgment for my client
The marital home may be the most important asset when going through a divorce. When a couple decides to divorce, someone has to leave. But who? Negotiation for property division became complex when ... mortgages, deeds and net proceeds are involved. As a result of tough negotiation, my client retained the marital home and was awarded a lump sum settlement to assist in the purchase of the home from the divorcing spouse.
OUTCOME: Father awarded joint custody
Mother and Father were unmarried and had a child together. Mother fought for full custody of their child. My client (Father) was very active in raising the child and deserved joint custody.
OUTCOME: As a result of a proper workplace investigation, employee was terminated as a result of misleading employer
Employer accused of inappropriate workplace behavior. Employee had hidden a prior criminal conviction from employer even after a full background check was completed by an independent third party.
OUTCOME: Life estate holder prevailed
A life estate tenant was being evicted in a property which was being sold as part of a divorce proceeding. Life estate holder was seeking compensation from the tenants in common who refused to meet th ... e demands of the life estate holder.
OUTCOME: Employee prevailed
An employee of a large retailer was terminated for misconduct and was refused unemployment benefits. After a hearing, it was determined that employer did not have uniform procedures and polices were no ... t consistently enforced.
OUTCOME: Consumer prevailed, received just compensation and product nationally recalled.
A national dog food supplier sold contaminated food to a consumer. As a result, the dog suffered salmonella poisoning. When the consumer contacted the supplier, company denied liability and refused t ... o reimburse consumer for vet bills and other costs.
OUTCOME: Contractor was found liable to plaintiffs
Contractor was in violation of MGL c93A by refusing to honor terms of an executed contract.