In re: Kagenveama, 541 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2008)
N/AOUTCOME: (1) Overruled by In re: Flores, 735 F.3d 855 (9th Cir. 2013 en banc); (2) Overruled by In re: Lanning, 130 S. Ct. 2464 (S. Ct. 2010)
Determined that (1) applicable commitment period is temporal and linked to the existence of disposable income; and that (2) projected disposable income is mechanical calculation of disposable income as ... defined by 11 USC 1325(b)(2), projected over the applicable commitment period.
