Phoenix, AZ
Personal injury Lawyer at Phoenix, AZ
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Insurance ... +4 more
OUTCOME: Settled for de minimis amount
Plaintiff sued various manufacturers of asbestos-containing products after allegedly developing mesothelioma from exposure to such products. I served as lead counsel for a major product manufacturer a ... nd effectively demonstrated that Plaintiff's disease was not caused by exposure to my client's asbestos-containing product.
OUTCOME: Facilitated a favorable resolution for all insureds and protected carrier against bad faith claims.
I represented a large insurance carrier in a complex insurance coverage matter involving multiple insureds, all of whom were involved in the construction of the W Hotel in Scottsdale. Certain of the i ... nsureds demanded that the carrier settle the claims against them, while other insureds demanded that the carrier not settle and, instead, preserve the available limits for the defense of all insureds.
OUTCOME: Settled for de minimis amount.
Purchaser of floor coating product claimed millions of dollars in damages stemming from floors that allegedly failed. On behalf of product manufacturer, we argued that Plaintiff applied the product in ... a negligent and improper fashion and used the product for a purpose other than what was intended.
OUTCOME: Summary Judgment Granted for School District - Affirmed on Appeal
Parents brought negligence and Section 1983 civil rights suit against Glendale Union High School District alleging that mentally disabled student was physically assaulted by other students while in the ... locker room. School argued that the events never happened and that, even if they did happen, school was not negligent and was not subject to civil rights liability.
OUTCOME: Summary Judgment Granted for School District - Affirmed on Appeal
A high school student was killed and others were seriously injured in an automobile collision that occurred off-campus during the lunch hour. Plaintiffs alleged that the school was negligent in allowi ... ng students to leave campus for lunch and in failing to enforce its modified closed-campus policy. In response, we argued that the school had no duty to protect against injuries occurring in off-campus lunchtime accidents.
OUTCOME: Settled for de minimis amount.
Plaintiff was physically assaulted in a parking lot by three off-duty police officers who had recently left the Defendant's bar. Plaintiff alleged that the bar was legally responsible for his injuries ... due to the alleged overservice of alcohol and the alleged failure to provide adequate security. On behalf of the bar, we argued that there was no evidence of service to an obviously intoxicated person and that the bar acted reasonably and complied with all Arizona laws and regulations.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
