Honolulu, HI
DUI and DWI Lawyer at Honolulu, HI
Practice Areas: DUI & DWI, Civil Rights
OUTCOME: WIN- Mr. Roa's Second Amendment rights were vindicated and restored.
Mr. Roa was denied his Second Amendment rights because he was found guilty of a "violation", "disorderly conduct". Although he was not a prohibited possessor by statute, the Honolulu Police department ... treated him as such and denied him his Second Amendment rights. Mr. O'Grady, and Mr. Beck, sued Honolulu and won and Mr. Roa can now exercise his Second Amendment rights.
OUTCOME: WIN- Mr. Choda had his Second Amendment rights vidnicated and restored.
Mr. Choda had been convicted of harassment and disorderly conduct, for yelling at his neighbor. He was not a prohibited possessor, yet Hawaii County police treated him as such and denied him his Secon ... d Amendment rights. Mr. O'Grady, and Mr. Beck, sued Hawaii county and vindicated and restored his Second Amendment Rights.
OUTCOME: Mr. Derego's conviction was vacated because the use of the prior statements by the co-defendant was improper
Mr. Derego was convicted of murder. At trial the co-defendant testified that his prior statements to the police were lies and he refused to answer any other questions. The court allowed the prior sta ... tements to be used against Mr. Derego.
OUTCOME: Mr. O'Grady won with all 5 justices ruling in his favor
Laser speeding case. Mr. O'Grady challenged the officers' training of the lasergun before the Hawaii Supreme Court. The ruling impacted the entire state and caused all agencies to review their office ... rs' training and the way they testify about any training they received. Many officers' training was found to be inadequate causing many cases to be thrown out.
OUTCOME: Mr. O'Grady won with all 5 justices ruling in his favor
Pitts, at trial for attempted murder, ultimately proceeded with standby counsel. Following his guilty verdict Pitts pleaded for counsel to be appointed for post-trial motions and sentencing. That was ... denied. On Appeal Mr. O'Grady argued before the Hawaii Supreme Court that the right to counsel applied at the critical stages of post-trial motions and sentencing.
OUTCOME: Mr. O'Grady won with all 5 justices ruling in his favor
Defendant Scott was indigent and his court appointed counsel sought transcripts of a trial that involved a co-defendant, who was brought to trial separately, for the same events. The court denied the ... transcripts and video of the proceedings. Mr. O'Grady, on appeal, argued before the Hawaii Supreme Court that every defendant has a right to transcripts when it would be beneficial to the defendant.
OUTCOME: pending appeal of Preliminary injunction denial. At 9th Cir. court of appeals
A Hawaii second amendment case challenging the issuance of CCW and open permits and a variety of other statutes regarding the carrying of arms
OUTCOME: pending
A Hawaii Supreme Court DUI case that among other issues, addresses whether or not a person arrested for DUI has a statutory or Hawaii Constitutional right to counsel. On behalf of the Hawaii Associati ... on of Criminal Defense Lawyers, (HACDL) Mr. O'Grady submitted an amicus brief (friend of the court) arguing that Mr. Won does have a Hawaii Constitutional right to counsel and that his statutory right to counsel was violated when he was arrested for DUI.
OUTCOME: pending
A second amendment case that deals with carrying openly and concealed. Mr. O'Grady filed an amicus brief at the United States Supreme Court.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
