Gaudio v. Ford Motor Company,
Jan 01, 2009OUTCOME: Settled
976 A.2d 524 (Pa. Super. 2009), A host of substantive and evidentiary issues regarding a consumer’s right to recover under strict products liability principles of law.
Larry E Coben's Legal Cases (10)
Scottsdale, AZ
Class action Lawyer at Scottsdale, AZ
Practice Areas: Class Action, Personal Injury ... +2 more
Pursell v. Volkswagen
Feb 01, 2008OUTCOME: 10.2 million dollar verdict
Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County Pennsylvania., Products liability case for lack of an anti-submarining ramp for the rear center seated occupant.
Munro v. Galati and General Motors Corporation
Jan 01, 1997OUTCOME:
Arizona Supreme Court - No Federal Preemption of "No Air Bag Claim" (938P.2d 1114 (1997)).
Connolly v. Dobbins, et. al.
N/AOUTCOME: 20 Million Dollar Verdict
Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. $20 Million Dollar Verdict against a trucking company for the brain injury suffered by a single 28 year old man who drove his car into the rear end of a tractor trail ... er stopped on the Skuylkill Expressway.
Harris v. Ford Motor Company
N/AOUTCOME: $8.8 million dollar verdict
New Jersey Super. Ct., Products liability case stemming from a roll over accident.
Walker v. Schutt Sports Sales Group
N/AOUTCOME: 12 million dollar verdict
Gayson Ct., April 2000. Largest known verdict against a football helmet company - without any setoff - regarding spinal cord injury.
Yarusso v. Bell Helmets
N/AOUTCOME:
Delaware Super. Ct.. First reported verdict against motorcycle helmet manufacturer regarding helmet shock attenuation design and spinal cord injury.
Peisino v. Riddell Corporation
N/AOUTCOME:
Wilmington, Delaware. First known verdict in the nation for a football player who suffered a spinal cord injury due to helmet design/shock attenuation.
Hoak v. Pottsville Hospital
N/AOUTCOME: $6 Million Dollar verdict
Pottsville, Pennsylvania. Failure to timely diagnose a tear in the aorta resulting in paralysis.
Buongiovanni v. General Motors Corporation
N/AOUTCOME: $26 million verdict
Obtained a verdict on behalf of a client who suffered a catastrophic spinal cord injury as a result of the defective design of a seat back that failed in a rear end collision.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
