Nathans v Unum, 549 F. Supp.3d 1052 (C.D. Cal., 2021)
Jul 20, 2021OUTCOME: Unum's defense based on ERISA preemption was denied.
Defeated Unum's Motion for Summary Judgment based on ERIA preemption)
Appeals Lawyer
Practice Areas: Appeals, Insurance, Employee Benefits
OUTCOME: Unum's defense based on ERISA preemption was denied.
Defeated Unum's Motion for Summary Judgment based on ERIA preemption)
OUTCOME: Plaintiff won after a court trial.
Plaintiff had Fibromyalgia and the insurance company denied her benefits.
OUTCOME: Plaintiff won the case after a court trial.
The insurance company denied the Plaintiff's disability benefits based on erroneous occupational information.
OUTCOME: The Court granted Plaintiff his benefits after a court trial.
After being on claim for chronic fatigue syndrome, the insurance company terminated benefits, claiming that Plaintiff had improved.
OUTCOME: Plaintiff won her disability benefits.
The Plaintiff successfully overturned the insurance company's denial of benefits, proving her disability.
OUTCOME: Verdict for Plaintiff after a court trial.
Plaintiff who had Lupus successfully challenged the insurance company's denial of benefits.
OUTCOME: Verdict for Plaintiff
The insurance company denied the Plaintiff's claim for disability benefits, claiming that she could perform her own occupation. The decision was overturned after a Court trial.
OUTCOME: Judgment for Plaintiff
OUTCOME: Judgment for Plaintiff
OUTCOME: Judgment for Plaintiff