Amy Strain Creech

**Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this review are my own and based on my personal experience. This review is intended to provide an opinion only. Choosing a lawyer is a personal decision and should be made after careful consideration.** I recently received a letter from this attorney represe...nting my ex-wife. The letter lacked substantive factual information and, in my opinion, reflected poorly on the attorney's professionalism. Here are my observations based on this particular instance: 1. **Lack of Factual Basis**: The correspondence appeared to contain unfounded assertions with no supporting evidence. It felt as though the primary motivation was financial gain rather than a pursuit of justice. 2. **Inappropriate Conduct**: The attorney's documentation seemed to condone inappropriate behavior, such as a significantly older adult texting a minor with whom he has no familial relation. This is deeply concerning and should be unacceptable to anyone aware of the risks associated with child predators. 3. **Encouragement of Double Standards**: The attorney appeared to support double standards in co-parenting, disregarding the fact that both parents have 50/50 joint legal and physical custody of their children. 4. **Disregard for Cooperative Efforts**: It seemed that the attorney placed little value on efforts to work cooperatively for the benefit of the children and all parties involved. The focus appeared to be solely on her client's desires, with little regard for fairness. This attorney also appears to condone their client utilizing email communications that are based in foreign countries in order for the client to circumvent United States subpoena laws and practices. 5. **Aggressive Tactics**: The attorney's approach included threats of legal action and arrest, which I found counterproductive to fostering cooperation and resolving disputes amicably. 6. **Unprofessional Communication Techniques**: The letter sent by this attorney included a “PS” section, typically known as a postscript addition to a document. I could find no instance where this is practical or deemed appropriate in legal documentation, nor could I find any professional legal document where this technique was utilized. It made it seem as if the client had written the letter and the lawyer just sent it with no regard to how unprofessional that technique would be perceived. In a city like Huntsville, I believe there are better options available for those seeking legal representation in a divorce. This is, of course, my humble opinion based on my experience.