Edens v. Brundage-Bone - Idaho Industrial Commission - C 2008-035062; 2014-004950; 2014-011138
Jun 07, 2016OUTCOME: Favorable
Compensable Injury, Occupation Disease, Dispute Between Surety.
Joseph Mark Wager Jr.'s Legal Cases (13)
Meridian, ID
Construction and development Lawyer at Meridian, ID
Practice Areas: Construction & Development, Business
Gerdon v. Con Paulos - Idaho Supreme Court - Docket No. 43234-2015
May 27, 2016OUTCOME: Affirm
The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the order of the Industrial Commission. This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission holding that a worker injured in an industrial accident had failed ... to prove that he was entitled to benefits for psychological care. Because the Commission’s decision was based upon its constitutional right to weigh the evidence and determine the credibility of conflicting expert opinions, we affirm the order of the Commission.
Lawson v Addus Healthcare - Idaho Industrial Commission - IC 2012-024774; 2013-031337
Jan 19, 2016OUTCOME: Favorable
Reconsideration RE: Compensable Injury
Davis v. Gary Amoth Trucking - Idaho Industrial Commission - IC 2012-005977; IC 2012-024518; IC 2013-028072; IC 2013-028073
Apr 25, 2015OUTCOME: Favorable
Compensability
Gerdon v. Con Paulos - Idaho Industrial Commission - IC 2008-019169
Apr 07, 2015OUTCOME: Favorable
Compensability of a psychological condition.
Lawson v Addus Healthcare - Idaho Industrial Commission - IC 2012-024774; 2013-031337
Mar 04, 2015OUTCOME: Favorable
Compensable Injury
Trudy Deon v. H & J, Inc. - Idaho Supreme Court - Docket No. 41593
Nov 28, 2014OUTCOME: Remand
In this worker compensation case, the Idaho Industrial Commission found Trudy Deon to be totally and permanently disabled from a work-related injury. The Commission held that her employer, H&J, Inc., ... was 100% liable for her disability benefits. However, the Commission, acting on its own volition, decided to reconsider its decision because during the proceedings Deon had made a settlement with the Idaho Special Indemnity Fund wherein that entity had assumed partially responsible for her disability. The Commission determined that Deon was precluded by the doctrine of collateral estoppel from claiming the employer was 100% liable for her disability. It reduced the employer’s responsibility for her benefits to 23.92%. The Supreme Court reversed the reconsideration, holding that the Industrial Commission could not sua sponte (acting on its own volition) raise a collateral estoppel defense.
Gilbert v. Marquis - Idaho Industrial Commission - IC 2010-015897
Sep 03, 2014OUTCOME: Favorable
Compensability, Medical Care, Disability
Anderson v. Advanced Custom Cabinets - Idaho Industrial Commission - IC 2013-004877
Aug 26, 2014OUTCOME: Favorable
Compensability
Gonzales v. Champion Produce - Idaho Industrial Commission - IC 2011-029488
Aug 06, 2014OUTCOME: Favorable
Disability Determination
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
