Tampa, FL
Criminal defense Lawyer at Tampa, FL
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Sex Crime ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Not Guilty Verdict
Rocky represented a man accused of delivering cocaine within 1000 feet of a church and possession of cocaine. Rocky presented a defense at trial of mistaken identity based on poor police work by the de ... tective. The jury found Rocky’s client not guilty.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty Verdict
Rocky represented a man accused of driving while his license was suspended. Rocky’s client’s driving record was extensive, and he qualified as a Habitual Traffic Offender, a felony. At trial, the prose ... cutor introduced a copy of the client’s redacted driving record to establish his license was suspended. Rocky argued to the jury that the record was prepared by bureaucrats who are not present in court to be tested through cross examination. Why trust a bureaucrat when a man’s liberty is at stake? The jury found Rocky’s client Not Guilty.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty Verdict
Rocky represented a man accused of kidnapping and robbing a woman. At trial, Rocky presented a mistaken identity defense at trial. The jury found Rocky’s client Not Guilty of both charges.
OUTCOME: Lesser Verdict on a Misdemeanor
Rocky represented a man accused of Aggravated Battery, Great Bodily Harm. The jury returned a misdemeanor lesser verdict of Battery.
OUTCOME: Lesser Verdict on a Misdemeanors
Rocky represented a man accused of aggravated battery with a firearm, aggravated assault with a firearm and carrying a concealed firearm. The jury found Rocky’s client Not Guilty of carrying a conceale ... d firearm. The jury returned lesser misdemeanor verdicts of battery and assault on the other counts.
OUTCOME: Lesser Verdict on a Misdemeanors
Rocky represented a man accused of burglary of a home and theft. At trial, the jury returned a lesser misdemeanor verdict of Trespass and Petit Theft.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty Verdict
Rocky represented a man who was accused of robbing a man for expensive car rims with a gun. Before trial, Rocky went to his client’s home and the incident scene to investigate. He also went to the evi ... dence room and examined all evidence, including a reversible jacket that had distinct lettering on one side. Both visits proved crucial in cross examination, as Rocky knew the details of the scene and the evidence better than the prosecutor or detectives. Rocky mounted a mistaken identity defense. The jury found Rocky’s client Not Guilty of both counts.
OUTCOME: Misdemeanor Verdict
Rocky represented a man accused of robbing a store merchant of merchandise he was trying to steal. At trial, Rocky mounted a defense that the only thing his client was guilty of was resisting the merch ... ant who attacked him. The jury agreed and found Rocky’s client guilty of a misdemeanor Resisting a Merchant.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty Verdict
Rocky represented a man accused of stealing a car. The defense at trial is that Rocky’s client bought the vehicle, which was sold as scrap. A title, therefore, was not necessary to prove his client’s l ... awful possession. The jury found Rocky’s client Not Guilty.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty Verdict
Rocky represented a man accused of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and battery. The jury found Rocky’s client Not Guilty of both counts.