In re Estate of Roberts, 2008 WL 763780 (Tenn.Ct.App. December 02, 2008)
Dec 02, 2008OUTCOME: Mr. Rice's client won. The trial judge was reversed.
Appeal from Judge's dismissal of prenuptial agreement.
PRO
Larry Rice's Legal Cases (10)
Memphis, TN
Divorce and separation Lawyer at Memphis, TN
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Child Custody ... +3 more
Bumpus v. Bumpus, 2008 WL 763780 (Tenn.Ct.App. March 25, 2008)
Mar 25, 2008OUTCOME: Mr. Rice's client, the father won. Custody removed from mother and granted to father. Mother's petition for contempt dismissed.
Mr. Rice represented the father. Father had a petition for custody and mother had a petition for contempt against the father.
McIntire v. McIntire, 2006 WL 1627377 (Tenn.Ct.App. June 13, 2006)
Jun 13, 2006OUTCOME: Mr. Rice's client, the mother won. The father's request to move to Nashville, TN was denied. Custody changed to mother. Mother awarded attorneys fees.
Mr. Rice represented the mother. This was a child custody and relocation case. Father had custody and sought to relocate the children to Nashville, TN.
Ward v. Ward II, 2004 WL 787158 (Tenn.Ct.App. April 12, 2004)
Apr 12, 2004OUTCOME: Mr. Rice's client, the husband won. Trial court upheld.
Mr. Rice represented the husband. Wife appealed from Husband winning the retrial of the issue of dissipation. This was from Ward v.Ward I.
Frame v. Frame, 2003 (WL 22768795 (Tenn.Ct.App. November 21, 2003)
Nov 21, 2003OUTCOME: Mr. Rice's client, the mother won.
Mr. Rice represented the mother. Mr. Rice won child support hearing at trial by showing father was "underemployed" and father appealed. Father's appeal was dismissed.
Sparrow v. Sparrow, 2002 WL 31895711 (Tenn.Ct.App. December 23, 2002)
Dec 23, 2002OUTCOME: Mr. Rice's client, the father, won.
Mr. Rice represented the father at trial and won custody to the father. Mr. Rice appealed to the court arguing that the amount of child support paid by mother was too low. The court of appeals remanded ... it to trial court to increase mother's child support.
Ward v. Ward I, 2002 WL 31845229 (Tenn.Ct.App. December 19, 2002)
Dec 19, 2002OUTCOME: Mr. Rice and the husband won.
Mr. Rice represented the husband. A complicated case on alimony, property division and retirement. The case was remanded after Mr. Rice prevailed when court set out a new rule for dissipation issues. A ... t the re-trial, the trial court agreed with Mr. Rice. The wife appealed again and lost on the appeal in Ward v. Ward II
Eldridge v. Eldridge, 137 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn.Ct.App. August 08, 2002)
Aug 08, 2002OUTCOME: Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Mr. Rice represented the husband. A complex divorce case with multiple issues on separate and marital property, alimony, recusal, child support, grounds, attorneys fees and pendente lite support. The w ... ife's attorney accused Mr. Rice (the husband's attorney) of mis-representing the case. The court of appeals found, "The Bradfield case cited by Husband states exactly as Husband represented to the court" (page 18).
Okerson v. Okerson, 1997 WL 142345 (Tenn.Ct.App. March 27, 1997)
Mar 27, 1997OUTCOME: The mother, represented by Mr. Rice, won.
Mr. Rice represented the Mother. It was a complex case involving alimony, college education for the children, consent orders, division of marital property and attorneys fees. Mr. Rice won on all issues ... except for prospective attorneys fees which was remanded to trial and was won there.
Lowrey v. Lowrey, 1991 WL 161383 (Tenn.Ct.App. August 23, 1991)
Aug 23, 1991OUTCOME: Mr. Rice and the court were affirmed on all issues, Mr. Rice and his client won.
Mr. Rice represented the wife. It was a complex case involving evaluation of businesses, marital property, alimony and attorneys fees.