Jose G Oliveira's Legal Cases (3)

Foreclosure

Bank of America, N.A. v. Jaikaran, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 225a (Fla. 9th Jud. Cir., Aug 19, 2014).

Aug 19, 2014

OUTCOME: The court rules that the Defendants were the prevailing party and that they are entitled to collect prevailing party attorney fees based on paragraph 22 of the mortgage.

Mortgage foreclosure -- Attorney's fees -- Mutuality or reciprocity of obligation -- Prevailing mortgagor is entitled to recover attorney's fees under section 57.105(7)

Foreclosure

Partners Federal Credit Union v. Sommerman, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 649a (Fla. 9th Jud. Cir., Jan 16, 2014).

Jan 16, 2014

OUTCOME: The case was involuntarily dismissed

Notice of intent to accelerate that did not state exact language set out in mortgage failed to satisfy condition precedent to foreclosure

Consumer protection

Financial Portfolios, II, Inc. v. Ortiz, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1033a (Fla. 10th Jud. Cir., Jun 2, 2011).

Jun 02, 2011

OUTCOME: Creditor was unable to garnish client's wages.

Where plaintiff had no evidence upon which to base sworn denial filed in opposition to defendant's claim of exemption, defendant is awarded attorney's fees and costs incurred in proving claim for exemp ... tion

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

The Avvo Rating explained