Bryon R Aven

Bryon R Aven

also known as Bryon Aven, Bryon R. Aven

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 1.6

Licensed for 18 years

Litigation Lawyer at Saint Johns, FL
Practice Areas: Litigation, Civil Rights

Julington Creek, Saint Johns, FL

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023
See Details

About Bryon

Biography

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Civil Rights 50%

Civil Litigation, Trial Counsel, Civil Litigation, State Court Litigation ,Federal Litigation ,Jury Trials, Bench Trials Case Evaluation, Trial Preparation, Witness Preparation Evidentiary Issues, Appellate Preservation, Litigation Strategy.

50%
Litigation 50%

Trial and litigation counsel for law firms and attorneys, including trial preparation, trial strategy, targeted trial assignments, co-counsel engagements, and lead trial responsibility.

15 years | 2,500 cases

50%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Florida for 18 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 2008

Member in Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2023

Location

Florida Trial Counsel

Julington Creek, Saint Johns, FL, 32259

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Bryon R Aven's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Bryon R Aven's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Bryon

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  1.6 (Extreme Caution)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023.

Suspension with Conditions issued in FL, 2023

updated on 01/17/2024

This means an attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Public Reprimand issued in FL, 2021

updated on 08/09/2021

Public reprimand means the attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar warns the lawyer in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.

Work Experience

2026 - Present

Founder & Senior Trial Counsel, Florida Trial Counsel

2021 - 2023

Assistant State Attorney, Office of the State Attorney, Eighteenth Judicial Circuit

2014 - 2015

Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney’s Office, Middle District of Florida

2012 - 2015

Adjunct Instructor, College of Central Florida – Criminal Justice Institute

2008 - 2021

Assistant State Attorney, Office of the State Attorney, Fifth Judicial Circuit

Sample of Legal Cases

State v. Jarvis Kelly — Brevard County Narcotics Jury Trial

Jury-trial judgment and sentence affirmed by the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal.

State v. Diderot Suffrena — Brevard County Jury Trial

Jury conviction; sentenced to 30 years in prison. Judgment later affirmed on appeal.

State v. Russell Rowe — Brevard County Extortion Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty of extortion.

State v. Calvin Epps — Witness Tampering Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged.

State v. Willie Jones — Armed Robbery Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged.

State v. Danielle Bagley — Methamphetamine Trafficking Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged. Fifteen-year prison sentence; judgment affirmed on appeal.

State v. Traquail Fort — Armed Kidnapping and Robbery Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged.

State v. James Strawder — Marion County Sexual Battery Jury Trial

Jury returned a guilty verdict on one count of sexual battery by familial/custodial authority; the matter later resolved with a negotiated 20-year sentence and waiver of appeal.

United States v. Reginald Howard — Federal Firearm Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged. Conviction later affirmed on appeal.

United States v. Jerry Wana Taylor — Federal Firearm Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty of possession of a firearm; not guilty of possession of ammunition. Conviction later affirmed on appeal.

State v. Duane Adams — Marion County Jury Trial

Mixed jury verdict: guilty on the charged offenses except one lewd/lascivious molestation count, on which the jury returned a not-guilty verdict.

State v. Austin Freeman — Marion County Child Sexual Battery Jury Trial

Jury returned guilty verdicts; the sexual-battery conviction resulted in a life sentence. One additional count was vacated after verdict at the State's request.

State v. Karim Clarke — Marion County Sexual Battery Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged. Two counts were later reversed on appeal; the matter remains included only with that qualification.

State v. Dennis Bell — Child Pornography Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged.

State v. Jerrod Chandler — Sexual Offender Registration Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged.

State v. George Fout — Marion County Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged. Life sentence imposed; later appellate proceedings affirmed the judgment.

State v. Michael Frye — Second Kidnapping and Sexual Battery Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged. Three life sentences imposed.

State v. Russell Post — Marion County Sexual Battery Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged.

State v. Michael Frye — Kidnapping and Sexual Battery Jury Trial

Jury verdict: Guilty as charged. Life sentence imposed.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2007

University of Minnesota Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

2001

Weber State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2023
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution